Orosensory stimulation is sufficient and postingestive negative feedback is not necessary for neuropeptide Y to increase sucrose intake
- PMID: 16540131
- DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.01.018
Orosensory stimulation is sufficient and postingestive negative feedback is not necessary for neuropeptide Y to increase sucrose intake
Abstract
Although central administration of neuropeptide Y (NPY) has a potent orexic effect, it is not clear how NPY changes the potency of peripheral feedbacks from the gut to prolong eating and increase meal size. It has been suggested that NPY increases the stimulating effect of orosensory sweet stimuli or that it decreases the inhibitory effect of postingestive stimuli. To clarify this issue, we compared the orexic effect of NPY (2 microg) injected into the third ventricle of the brain on the volume and microstructure of intake of 0.8M sucrose during sham feeding (SF) and real feeding (RF) in male Sprague Dawley rats. The rationale for this comparison is that orosensory stimulation occurs in SF and RF, but postingestive negative feedback is present only in RF. NPY increased the volume ingested and the rate and number of clusters of licking significantly more in SF than in RF. This demonstrates that orosensory sucrose stimulation is sufficient and postingestive negative feedback is not necessary for the orexic effect of NPY under these experimental conditions.
Similar articles
-
Effects of neuropeptide Y on feeding microstructure: dissociation of appetitive and consummatory actions.Behav Neurosci. 2006 Aug;120(4):937-51. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.4.937. Behav Neurosci. 2006. PMID: 16893299
-
Neuropeptide Y administration into the third ventricle does not increase sucrose or ethanol self-administration but does affect the cortical EEG and increases food intake.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Mar;160(2):146-54. doi: 10.1007/s00213-001-0950-9. Epub 2002 Jan 10. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002. PMID: 11875632
-
Intraventricular neuropeptide Y decreases need-induced sodium appetite and increases pica in rats.Behav Neurosci. 1999 Aug;113(4):826-32. Behav Neurosci. 1999. PMID: 10495090
-
John Davis and the meanings of licking.Appetite. 2001 Feb;36(1):84-92. doi: 10.1006/appe.2000.0371. Appetite. 2001. PMID: 11161348 Review.
-
The conditioned satiating effect of orosensory stimuli.Physiol Behav. 2009 Jun 22;97(3-4):293-303. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.03.028. Epub 2009 Apr 6. Physiol Behav. 2009. PMID: 19358860 Review.
Cited by
-
Inactivation of the median raphe nucleus increases intake of sucrose solutions: a microstructural analysis.Behav Neurosci. 2011 Aug;125(4):529-40. doi: 10.1037/a0024372. Behav Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 21688889 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of hindbrain melanin-concentrating hormone and neuropeptide Y administration on licking for water, saccharin, and sucrose solutions.Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008 Feb;294(2):R329-43. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00611.2006. Epub 2007 Nov 7. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008. PMID: 17989139 Free PMC article.
-
The taste of sugars.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008 Jul;32(5):1024-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 Apr 18. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008. PMID: 18499254 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ghrelin increases the motivation to eat, but does not alter food palatability.Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2012 Aug 1;303(3):R259-69. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00488.2011. Epub 2012 Jun 6. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2012. PMID: 22673784 Free PMC article.
-
Y1 receptors modulate taste-related behavioral responsiveness in male mice to prototypical gustatory stimuli.Horm Behav. 2021 Nov;136:105056. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2021.105056. Epub 2021 Sep 9. Horm Behav. 2021. PMID: 34509673 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous