Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2006 Mar;41(3):374-84.
doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000185575.36591.fc.

Sexual risk reduction interventions do not inadvertently increase the overall frequency of sexual behavior: a meta-analysis of 174 studies with 116,735 participants

Natalie D Smoak  1 , Lori A J Scott-Sheldon, Blair T Johnson, Michael P Carey
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Sexual risk reduction interventions do not inadvertently increase the overall frequency of sexual behavior: a meta-analysis of 174 studies with 116,735 participants

Natalie D Smoak et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006 Mar.

Abstract

A meta-analytic review of the influence of HIV risk reduction interventions on sexual occasions, number of partners, and abstinence was conducted to assess whether condom-related interventions inadvertently undermine sexual risk reduction efforts by increasing the frequency of sexual behavior. Included studies examined sexual risk reduction strategies and used a controlled design. Data from 174 studies (206 interventions, N = 116,735 participants) were included. In general, HIV risk reduction interventions neither increased nor decreased sexual occasions or number of partners reported. Participants in intervention conditions were less likely to be sexually active than those in control conditions. When samples included more black participants, interventions reduced the number of sexual occasions; interventions were more successful at reducing the number of partners in samples that included more men who have sex with men (MSM) or individuals engaged in sex trading. Samples that included more MSM were more likely to adopt abstinence as a risk reduction strategy. Interventions that included more information, motivational enhancement, and skills training also led to greater risk reduction. HIV risk reduction interventions do not increase the overall frequency of sexual activity. To the contrary, for some subgroups, interventions that include components recommended by behavioral science theory reduce the frequency of sexual events and partners.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Impact of Information, Motivation, Behavioral Skills Components on Number of Occasions, Number of Partners, and Sexual Activity Status
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Semann S, Des Jarlais DC, Sogolow E, et al. A meta-analysis of the effect of HIV prevention interventions on the sex behaviors of drug users in the United States. J Acq Immun Def Synd. 2002;30:73–93. - PubMed
    1. Reinking D, van Zessen G, Kretzschmar M, Brouwers H, et al. Social transmission routes of HIV: A combined sexual network and life course perspective. Patient Educ Couns. 1994;24:289–97. - PubMed
    1. Cantania JA. Relationship of sexual mixing across age and ethnic groups to herpes simplex virus-2 among unmarried heterosexual adults with multiple sexual partners. Health Psych. 1996;15:362–70. - PubMed
    1. Parker M, Ward H, Day S. Sexual networks and the transmission of HIV in London. J Biosoc Sci. 1998;30:63–83. - PubMed
    1. Friedman SR, Flom PL, Kottiri BJ, Neaigus A, Sandoval M, Curtis R, Des Jarlais DC, Zenilman JM. Consistent condom use in the heterosexual relationships of young adults who live in a high-HIV-risk neighbourhood and do not use “hard drugs”. AIDS Care. 2001;13:285–96. - PubMed

Publication types