Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2005;62(9):851-4.

[Usefulness of biofeedback treatment in children with chronic functional constipation]

[Article in Polish]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 16541716
Randomized Controlled Trial

[Usefulness of biofeedback treatment in children with chronic functional constipation]

[Article in Polish]
Stanisław Pieczarkowski et al. Przegl Lek. 2005.

Abstract

Background: About 2/3 of constipated children present anal-rectal dyssynergy (ARD) with paradoxical contraction of the external anal sphincter (EAS) during defecation.

Aim: The aim of our study was to answer the question whether additional treatment with biofeedback training (BF) is more effective than traditional treatment.

Materials, methods: We assessed chronically constipated children who fulfilled the criteria of ARD: recto-sigmoid transit time in Hinton's test with radio-paque markers at least 28.8 h, paradoxical EAS contraction during defecation trials (anorectal manometry). The study included 22 constipated children (16 boys and 6 girls), aged 5 to 14 years (mean 8.1 +/- SD 2.8). Children were randomly divided in two groups. In group I at the start of the study children had four day-by-day sessions of BF training based on the anorectal manometry and the surface EMG. Children from group II received only traditional treatment. The follow-up was 6 months. Improvement was estimated based on manometric data, number and quality of stools.

Results: In the group I after one month, more manometric parameters, significantly improved as compared to the II group. During the observation period the number of stools increased and their quality improved in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the above mentioned symptoms.

Conclusions: Treatment with BF can improve rectal sensation and particularly defecation dynamics, faster than the traditional method. There is no significant effect of additional BF treatment on such objective symptoms as the number and quality of stools.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources