Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Apr 8;332(7545):815-20.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38773.518322.7C. Epub 2006 Mar 16.

The REACT study: randomised evaluation of assertive community treatment in north London

Helen Killaspy  1 , Paul Bebbington, Robert Blizard, Sonia Johnson, Fiona Nolan, Stephen Pilling, Michael King
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The REACT study: randomised evaluation of assertive community treatment in north London

Helen Killaspy et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare outcomes of care from assertive community treatment teams with care by community mental health teams for people with serious mental illnesses.

Design: Non-blind randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Two inner London boroughs.

Participants: 251 men and women under the care of adult secondary mental health services with recent high use of inpatient care and difficulties engaging with community services.

Interventions: Treatment from assertive community treatment team (127 participants) or continuation of care from community mental health team (124 participants).

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was inpatient bed use 18 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes included symptoms, social function, client satisfaction, and engagement with services.

Results: No significant differences were found in inpatient bed use (median difference 1, 95% confidence interval -16 to 38) or in clinical or social outcomes for the two treatment groups. Clients who received care from the assertive community treatment team seemed better engaged (adapted homeless engagement acceptance schedule: difference in means 1.1, 1.0 to 1.9), and those who agreed to be interviewed were more satisfied with services (adapted client satisfaction questionnaire: difference in means 7.14, 0.9 to 13.4).

Conclusions: Community mental health teams are able to support people with serious mental illnesses as effectively as assertive community treatment teams, but assertive community treatment may be better at engaging clients and may lead to greater satisfaction with services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flow of participants through trial
Fig 2
Fig 2
Number of bed days spent as an inpatient during 18 months' follow-up of clients with serious mental illness assigned to care by assertive community treatment team or community mental health team
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Melzer D, Hale AS, Malik SJ, Hogman GA, Wood S. Community care for patients with schizophrenia one year after hospital discharge. BMJ 1991;303: 1023-6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stein LI, Test MA. Alternatives to mental hospital treatment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1980;37: 392-7. - PubMed
    1. Hoult JC. Community care of the acutely mentally ill. Br J Psychiatry 1986;149: 337-44. - PubMed
    1. McGrew JH, Bond GR, Dietzen L, Salyers M. Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994;62: 670-8. - PubMed
    1. Marshall M, Lockwood A. Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2): CD001089. - PubMed

Publication types