Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Feb;87(1):45-60.
doi: 10.1017/S0016672306007944.

Bayesian analyses of multiple epistatic QTL models for body weight and body composition in mice

Affiliations

Bayesian analyses of multiple epistatic QTL models for body weight and body composition in mice

Nengjun Yi et al. Genet Res. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

To comprehensively investigate the genetic architecture of growth and obesity, we performed Bayesian analyses of multiple epistatic quantitative trait locus (QTL) models for body weights at five ages (12 days, 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks) and body composition traits (weights of two fat pads and five organs) in mice produced from a cross of the F1 between M16i (selected for rapid growth rate) and CAST/Ei (wild-derived strain of small and lean mice) back to M16i. Bayesian model selection revealed a temporally regulated network of multiple QTL for body weight, involving both strong main effects and epistatic effects. No QTL had strong support for both early and late growth, although overlapping combinations of main and epistatic effects were observed at adjacent ages. Most main effects and epistatic interactions had an opposite effect on early and late growth. The contribution of epistasis was more pronounced for body weights at older ages. Body composition traits were also influenced by an interacting network of multiple QTLs. Several main and epistatic effects were shared by the body composition and body weight traits, suggesting that pleiotropy plays an important role in growth and obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Genome-wide epistatic analysis of body weights: profiles of posterior inclusion probability, cumulative probability function, posterior means of main effect and proportion of phenotypic variance explained by main effect (PPV%). On the x-axis, outer tick marks represent chromosomes and inner tick marks represent markers. 12d, 3wk, 6wk, 9wk and 12wk represent body weights at day 12 and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks of age, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Genome-wide epistatic analysis of fat traits under model without adjustment for body weight at 12 weeks: profiles of posterior inclusion probability, cumulative probability function, posterior means of main effect and proportion of phenotypic variance explained by main effect (PPV%). On the x-axis, outer tick marks represent chromosomes and inner tick marks represent markers. GON, SUB and FAT represent perimetrial fat pad, right hindlimb subcutaneous fat pad and the sum of the two fat pads, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Genome-wide epistatic analysis of fat traits under model including adjustment for body weight at 12 weeks: profiles of posterior inclusion probability, cumulative probability function, posterior means of main effect and proportion of phenotypic variance explained by main effect (PPV%). On the x-axis, outer tick marks represent chromosomes and inner tick marks represent markers. GON, SUB and FAT represent perimetrial fat pad, right hindlimb subcutaneous fat pad and the sum of the two fat pads, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Genome-wide epistatic analysis of organ weights under model excluding adjustment for body weight at 12 weeks: profiles of posterior inclusion probability, cumulative probability function, posterior means of main effect and proportion of phenotypic variance explained by main effect (PPV%). On the x-axis, outer tick marks represent chromosomes and inner tick marks represent markers. HRT, LIV, SPL, TES and KID represent weights of heart, liver, spleen, testis and kidney, respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Genome-wide epistatic analysis of organ weights under model including adjustment for body weight at 12 weeks: profiles of posterior inclusion probability, cumulative probability function, posterior means of main effect and proportion of phenotypic variance explained by main effect (PPV%). On the x-axis, outer tick marks represent chromosomes and inner tick marks represent markers. HRT, LIV, SPL, TES and KID represent weights of heart, liver, spleen, testis and kidney, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allan MF, Eisen EJ, Pomp D. The M16 Mouse: An outbred animal model of early onset obesity and diabesity. Obesity Research. 2004;12:1397–1407. - PubMed
    1. Allison DB, Pietrobelli A, Faith MS, Fontaine KR, Gropp E, et al. Genetic influences on obesity. In: Eckel RH, editor. Obesity-mechanisms and clinical management. New York: Lippincott Williams & Willkins; 2002.
    1. Atchley WR, Riska B, Kohn L, Plummet A, Rutledge JJ. A quantitative genetic analysis of brain and body size associations, their origin and ontogeny: Data from mice. Evolution. 1984;38:1165–1179. - PubMed
    1. Atchley WR, Cowley DE, Xu S. Restricted index selection for altering developmental trajectories. Genetics. 1997;146:629–640. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brockmann GA, Bevova MR. Using mouse models to dissect the genetics of obesity. Trends Genetics. 2002;18:367–376. - PubMed

Publication types