Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Mar 20;24(9):1421-7.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.6052.

Postradiotherapy neck dissection for lymph node-positive head and neck cancer: the use of computed tomography to manage the neck

Affiliations

Postradiotherapy neck dissection for lymph node-positive head and neck cancer: the use of computed tomography to manage the neck

Stanley L Liauw et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To determine how to use node response on computed tomography (CT) to indicate the need for neck dissection.

Patients and methods: Five hundred fifty patients with lymph node-positive head and neck cancer were treated between 1990 and 2002 with radiotherapy (RT) at a median dose of 74.4 Gy; 24% of these patients (n = 133) were treated with chemotherapy. Three hundred forty-one patients (62%) underwent planned post-RT neck dissection. Physical examination and contrast-enhanced CT were performed 30 days after completion of RT. CT images were reviewed in 211 patients for lymph node size (largest axial dimension) and presence of a focal abnormality (lucency, enhancement, or calcification). By correlating post-RT CT to neck dissection pathology, criteria associated with a low likelihood of residual disease were identified. A subset of patients who fit these criteria of radiographic response who did not undergo post-RT neck dissection was observed for recurrence.

Results: Radiographic complete response (rCR) was defined as the absence of any large (> 1.5 cm) or focally abnormal lymph node. Correlation of response with neck dissection pathology indicated a negative predictive value of 77% for complete clinical response and 94% for rCR. In 32 patients (median follow-up time, 3.2 years) with rCR who did not undergo post-RT neck dissection, the 5-year ultimate neck control rate (100%) and cause-specific survival rate (72%) were not significantly different from the rates of patients with a negative post-RT neck dissection.

Conclusion: Patients with rCR 4 weeks after RT can be spared from a post-RT neck dissection regardless of initial node stage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by