The (soon forgotten) art of open stone surgery: to train or not to train?
- PMID: 16551423
- PMCID: PMC1964097
- DOI: 10.1308/003588406X95075
The (soon forgotten) art of open stone surgery: to train or not to train?
Abstract
To date, open stone surgery is now performed in a very limited number of selected cases. A review of our own cases revealed that open surgery constituted 1% of all procedures. These procedures were mostly ablative, or operations to deal with complications of failed minimally invasive therapies. Given two continuing trends towards sub-specialisation in urology on the one hand, and minimally invasive therapy on the other, the question arises whether and how sub-specialised stone surgeons should and can learn open stone surgery. Is it merely a lost art not to be bothered with, or is it something worthwhile preserving? This article discusses the pros and cons of the argument and suggests centralisation of complex stone cases as a possible way out of the dilemma.
References
-
- Kerbl K, Rehman J, Landman J, Lee D, Sundaram C, Clayman RV. Current management of urolithiasis: progress or regress? J Endourol. 2002;16:281–8. - PubMed
-
- Matlaga B, Assimos DG. Changing indications of open stone surgery. Urology. 2002;59:490–3. - PubMed
-
- Ather MH, Paryani J, Memon A, Sulaiman MN. A 10-year experience of managing ureteric calculi: changing trends towards endourological intervention – is there a role for open surgery? BJU Int. 2001;88:173–7. - PubMed
-
- Paik ML, Resnick MI. The role of open stone surgery in the management of urolithiasis. Techniques Urol. 1997;3:96–9. - PubMed
-
- Paik ML, Wainstein MA, Spirnak JP, Hampel N, Resnick MI. Current indications for open stone surgery in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1998;159:374–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous