Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Apr 10;94(7):955-8.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603044.

Delay in referral of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma to secondary care correlates with a more advanced stage at presentation, and is associated with poorer survival

Affiliations

Delay in referral of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma to secondary care correlates with a more advanced stage at presentation, and is associated with poorer survival

M Pitchers et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Squamous carcinoma of the oropharynx presents with symptoms common to many benign diseases, and this can cause delay in referral to secondary care. We investigate delay in referral, defining this as the time from symptom-onset to date of general practitioners referral letter to secondary care, and the effect of that delay, using a retrospective case notes based study of patients presenting at our institution with oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma between 1995 and 2005. Using correlation analysis and ordinal regression, we examined the relationship between increased referral delay from primary care, clinical stage at presentation, and survival. Increasing time from symptom onset to referral to secondary care was positively correlated with more advanced disease stage at presentation (r(s) = +0.346, P = 0.004). This was confirmed with ordinal regression modelling (delay estimate = 0.045, P = 0.042). Patients with delay of less than 6 weeks had significantly improved survival compared to those with a delay of greater than 6 weeks (P = 0.032). For every 1 week of delay in referral, we estimate that the stage of presentation will progress by 0.045 of 'a stage'.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort diagram for case selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean delay (in weeks) by clinical stage at presentation (error bars represent 95% confidence interval of mean).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of patients with a greater than 6 weeks delay in referral compared to patients with less than 6 weeks delay.

References

    1. Amir Z, Kwan SY, Landes D, Feber T, Williams SA (1999) Diagnostic delays in head and neck cancers. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 8: 198–203 - PubMed
    1. BAO-HNS (2002) Effective Head and Neck Cancer Management: Third Consensus Document. Document 6. London: British Association of Otorhinolaryngologists – Head and Neck Surgeons
    1. Crawford SC, Davis JA, Siddiqui NA, de Caestecker L, Gillis CR, Hole D, Penney G (2002) The waiting time paradox: population based retrospective study of treatment delay and survival of women with endometrial cancer in Scotland. BMJ 325: 196. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dhooge IJ, Albers FW, van Cauwenberge PB (1996) Clinical characteristics and diagnostic delay of head and neck cancer: results from a prospective study in Belgium. Eur J Surg Oncol 22: 354–358 - PubMed
    1. ECRIC (1999) Cancer incidence in the Eastern region. Eastern cancer registration and information center. Quayside Press: Cambridge

Publication types