Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jan 22;273(1583):207-15.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3283.

Both social and ecological factors predict ungulate brain size

Affiliations

Both social and ecological factors predict ungulate brain size

Susanne Shultz et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Among mammals, the members of some Orders have relatively large brains. Alternative explanations for this have emphasized either social or ecological selection pressures favouring greater information-processing capacities, including large group size, greater foraging efficiency, higher innovation rates, better invasion success and complex problem solving. However, the focal taxa for these analyses (primates, carnivores and birds) often show both varied ecological competence and social complexity. Here, we focus on the specific relationship between social complexity and brain size in ungulates, a group with relatively simple patterns of resource use, but extremely varied social behaviours. The statistical approach we used, phylogenetic generalized least squares, showed that relative brain size was independently associated with sociality and social complexity as well as with habitat use, while relative neocortex size is associated with social but not ecological factors. A simple index of sociality was a better predictor of both total brain and neocortex size than group size, which may indicate that the cognitive demands of sociality depend on the nature of social relationships as well as the total number of individuals in a group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The relationship between total brain size and ecological and social factors. The data shown are residuals of a log body/−log brain RMA regression controlling for phylogeny and other factors (see text for details) as explained: (a) the partial effects of sociality on relative brain size in ungulates; (b) the partial effect of different social systems on brain size; (c) the relationship between habitat use and relative brain size. In each case, the results control for the effects of phylogeny as well as habitat (in the case of (a) and (b)) and sociality (in the case of (c)), after removing the effects of phylogeny and sociality.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The relationship between (a) sociality and (b) social system and relative neocortex size. The neocortex data shown are residuals from a log body/log neocortex RMA regression.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aiello L, Wheeler P. The expensive tissue hypothesis: the brain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution. Curr. Anthropol. 1995;36:199–221. 10.1086/204350 - DOI
    1. Akaike H. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov B.N, Csaki F, editors. Second Int. Symp. on Information Theory. Akademiai Kiado; Budapest: 1973. pp. 267–281.
    1. Barton R.A. Neocortex and behavioural ecology in primates. Proc. R. Soc. B. 1996;263:173–177. - PubMed
    1. Barton R.A, Harvey P.H. Mosaic evolution of brain structure in mammals. Nature. 2000;405:1055–1058. 10.1038/35016580 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bateson P. Evolution and learning: the Baldwin effect reconsidered by Weber BH, Depew DJ. Biol. Phil. 2004;19:283–298. 10.1023/B:BIPH.0000024468.12161.83 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources