Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2006 Mar 23:7:6.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-6.

Lead editorial: trials - using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials

Editorial

Lead editorial: trials - using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials

Douglas G Altman et al. Trials. .

Abstract

This editorial introduces the new online, open access, peer-reviewed journal Trials. The journal considers manuscripts on any aspect of the design, performance, and findings of randomised controlled trials in any discipline related to health care, and also encourages the publication of protocols. Trialists will be able to provide the necessary detail for a true and complete scientific record. They will be able to communicate not only all outcome measures, as well as varying analyses and interpretations, but also in-depth descriptions of what they did and honest reflections about what they learnt. Trials also encourages articles covering generic issues related to trials, for example focussing on the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, or reporting.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Horton R. The scientific paper: fraudulent or formative? Abstract presented at Third International Congress on Biomedical Peer Review and Global Communications, Prague, September 1997.
    1. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gøtzsche PC, Lang T, for the CONSORT Group The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:663–694. - PubMed
    1. Plint AC, Moher D, Schulz K, Altman DG, Morrison A. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials? A systematic review. Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, Chicago, September 16–18, 2005.
    1. Chan A-W, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: Comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA. 2004;291:2457–2465. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.20.2457. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williamson PR, Gamble C, Altman DG, Hutton JL. Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis. Stat Meth Med Res. 2005;14:515–524. doi: 10.1191/0962280205sm415oa. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources