Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2007 May;92(3):F169-75.
doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.089490. Epub 2006 Mar 23.

Donor breast milk versus infant formula for preterm infants: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Donor breast milk versus infant formula for preterm infants: systematic review and meta-analysis

Catherine A Boyd et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 May.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effect of donor breast milk with infant formula in preterm infants. Separate comparisons with formula were made for donor breast milk that was: (1) given as a sole diet; (2) given as a supplement to mother's own breast milk; and (3) fortified with macronutrients and micronutrients. The main outcomes were death, necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), infection, growth and development.

Data sources: Electronic databases-Cochrane, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and HMIC: DH.

Review methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of trials and observational studies of preterm or low birthweight infants.

Results: Seven studies (including five randomised controlled trials), all from the 1970s and 1980s, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All studies compared the effect of sole donor breast milk with formula (combined n = 471). One of these also compared the effect of donor breast milk with formula given as a supplement to mother's own milk (n = 343). No studies examined fortified donor breast milk. A meta-analysis based on three studies found a lower risk of NEC in infants receiving donor breast milk compared with formula (combined RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.76). Donor breast milk was associated with slower growth in the early postnatal period, but its long-term effect is unclear.

Conclusion: Donor breast milk is associated with a lower risk of NEC and slower growth in the early postnatal period, but the quality of the evidence is limited. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and measure the effect of fortified or supplemented donor breast milk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Comment in

  • Banking for the future: investing in human milk.
    Williams AF, Kingdon CC, Weaver G. Williams AF, et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 May;92(3):F158-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.106716. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007. PMID: 17449849 Free PMC article.

References

    1. McGuire W, Henderson G, Fowlie P W. Feeding the preterm infant. BMJ 20043291227–1230. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawrence R A, Lawrence R M.Breastfeeding. A guide for the medical profession. St Louis, Missouri: Mosby 1999
    1. Wight N E. Donor human milk for preterm infants. J Perinatol 200121249–254. - PubMed
    1. Henderson G, Anthony M Y, McGuire W. Formula milk versus term human milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants (Cochrane Review). In: Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2004 - PubMed
    1. Henderson G, Anthony M Y, McGuire W. Formula milk versus preterm human milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants (Cochrane Review). In: Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2004