Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Jan;37(1):80-4.

The Sensorimotor System, Part II: The Role of Proprioception in Motor Control and Functional Joint Stability

Bryan L Riemann  1 , Scott M Lephart
Affiliations

The Sensorimotor System, Part II: The Role of Proprioception in Motor Control and Functional Joint Stability

Bryan L Riemann et al. J Athl Train. 2002 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To discuss the role of proprioception in motor control and in activation of the dynamic restraints for functional joint stability.

Data sources: Information was drawn from an extensive MEDLINE search of the scientific literature conducted in the areas of proprioception, motor control, neuromuscular control, and mechanisms of functional joint stability for the years 1970-1999.

Data synthesis: Proprioception is conveyed to all levels of the central nervous system. It serves fundamental roles for optimal motor control and sensorimotor control over the dynamic restraints.

Conclusions/applications: Although controversy remains over the precise contributions of specific mechanoreceptors, proprioception as a whole is an essential component to controlling activation of the dynamic restraints and motor control. Enhanced muscle stiffness, of which muscle spindles are a crucial element, is argued to be an important characteristic for dynamic joint stability. Articular mechanoreceptors are attributed instrumental influence over gamma motor neuron activation, and therefore, serve to indirectly influence muscle stiffness. In addition, articular mechanoreceptors appear to influence higher motor center control over the dynamic restraints. Further research conducted in these areas will continue to assist in providing a scientific basis to the selection and development of clinical procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ghez C. The control of movement. In: Kandel E R, Schwartz J H, Jessell T M, editors. Principles of Neural Science. 3rd ed. Elsevier Science; New York, NY: 1991. pp. 533–547.
    1. Hasan Z, Stuart D G. Animal solutions to problems of movement control: the role of proprioceptors. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1988;11:199–223. - PubMed
    1. Leonard C T. The Neuroscience of Human Movement. Mosby-Year Book Inc; St Louis, MO: 1998.
    1. Matthews P B. The 1989 James A.F. Stevenson memorial lecture. The knee jerk: still an enigma? Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1990;68:347–354. - PubMed
    1. Sainburg R L, Ghilardi M F, Poizner H, Chez C. Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. J Neurophysiol. 1995;73:820–835. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources