Probiotics for animal nutrition in the European Union. Regulation and safety assessment
- PMID: 16563585
- DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.02.004
Probiotics for animal nutrition in the European Union. Regulation and safety assessment
Abstract
Probiotics are alive micro-organisms, generally bacteria but also yeasts than, when ingested alive in sufficient amount, they have a positive effect on the health going beyond the nutritional ones commonly known. Probiotics may operate through a nutritional and/or health or sanitary effect. Micro-organisms used in animal feed in the EU are mainly bacterial strains of Gram-positive bacteria belonging to the types Bacillus, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Streptococcus and strains of yeast belonging to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae species and kluyveromyces. While most of the species and genera are apparently safe, certain micro-organisms may be problematic, particularly the enterococci, which may harbour transmissible antibiotic resistance determinants and bacilli, specially those belonging to the Bacillus cereus group that are known to produce enterotoxins and an emetic toxin. The history and the current legislation in the European Union on probiotics feed additives including the requirements for the safety assessment for the target animal species, consumers, workers, and environment are presented.
Similar articles
-
Regulating the safety of probiotics--the European approach.Curr Pharm Des. 2005;11(1):17-23. doi: 10.2174/1381612053382322. Curr Pharm Des. 2005. PMID: 15638749 Review.
-
[Probiotics--possibilities and limitations of their application in food, animal feed, and in pharmaceutical preparations for men and animals].Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2001 Nov-Dec;114(11-12):410-9. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2001. PMID: 11766268 Review. German.
-
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008. PMID: 18328408 Review.
-
Do bacteria need to be regulated?J Appl Microbiol. 2006 Sep;101(3):607-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02849.x. J Appl Microbiol. 2006. PMID: 16907810 Review.
-
EU assessment of enterococci as feed additives.Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Dec 1;88(2-3):247-54. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00187-9. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003. PMID: 14596997 Review.
Cited by
-
Integrated genome-based probiotic relevance and safety evaluation of Lactobacillus reuteri PNW1.PLoS One. 2020 Jul 20;15(7):e0235873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235873. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32687505 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro development and transfer of resistance to chlortetracycline in Bacillus subtilis.J Microbiol. 2012 Oct;50(5):807-12. doi: 10.1007/s12275-012-1454-5. Epub 2012 Nov 4. J Microbiol. 2012. PMID: 23124749
-
Antibiotic alternatives: the substitution of antibiotics in animal husbandry?Front Microbiol. 2014 May 13;5:217. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00217. eCollection 2014. Front Microbiol. 2014. PMID: 24860564 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Role of Exposure to Lactic Acid Bacteria from Foods of Animal Origin in Human Health.Foods. 2021 Sep 4;10(9):2092. doi: 10.3390/foods10092092. Foods. 2021. PMID: 34574202 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The commercial impact of pig Salmonella spp. infections in border-free markets during an economic recession.Vet World. 2015 Mar;8(3):257-72. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.257-272. Epub 2015 Mar 5. Vet World. 2015. PMID: 27047083 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources