Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Apr;81(4):1385-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.10.009.

Predicting survival in patients requiring renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery

Affiliations

Predicting survival in patients requiring renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery

Marzia Leacche et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Apr.

Abstract

Background: We sought to develop and internally validate a prediction score for all-cause in-hospital mortality in patients who have acute renal failure and require renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery.

Methods: From January 1992 to July 2001, 136 of 14,000 patients (0.9%) had acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, based on pre-renal replacement therapy variables, was used to construct a predictive score for all causes of in-hospital mortality. Subsequently, the score was validated in 27 patients who underwent surgery between August 2001 and March 2003.

Results: In-hospital mortality was 58% (79 of 136). From the logistic regression model, we assigned a score (range, 0 to 6) based on the presence of independent predictors of operative mortality (preoperative creatinine < or = 1.5 mg/dL [odds ratio (OR) = 5.0], hypertension [OR = 4.4], predialysis coma [OR = 9.6], sepsis [OR = 6.4], and total bilirubin > or = 2 mg/dL [OR = 5.6]). Higher scores strongly predicted mortality: patients who scored 3 or higher before the initiation dialysis (n = 54), had a mortality rate of 94% (51 of 54). In contrast, patients who scored 1 or less on this scale (n = 36), had a mortality of 16% (6 of 36). In the validation cohort, the sensitivity of the new score at the cutoff of 2 or fewer points versus 3 or more points was 0.71, the specificity was 0.90, the positive predictive value was 0.92, and the negative predictive value was 0.64.

Conclusions: The prediction score represents a simple and accurate tool for predicting in-hospital mortality associated with renal replacement therapy for cardiac surgery patients before the institution of this resource-intensive treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in