Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Apr;15(2):e1.
doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.012336.

German tobacco industry's successful efforts to maintain scientific and political respectability to prevent regulation of secondhand smoke

Affiliations

German tobacco industry's successful efforts to maintain scientific and political respectability to prevent regulation of secondhand smoke

A Bornhäuser et al. Tob Control. 2006 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the tactics the tobacco industry in Germany used to avoid regulation of secondhand smoke exposure and to maintain the acceptance of public smoking.

Methods: Systematic search of tobacco industry documents available on the internet between June 2003 and August 2004.

Results: In West Germany, policymakers were, as early as the mid 1970s, well aware of the fact that secondhand smoke endangers non-smokers. One might have assumed that Germany, an international leader in environmental protection, would have led in protecting her citizens against secondhand smoke pollution. The tobacco manufacturers in Germany, however, represented by the national manufacturing organisation "Verband" (Verband der Cigarettenindustrie), contained and neutralised the early debate about the danger of secondhand smoke. This success was achieved by carefully planned collaboration with selected scientists, health professionals and policymakers, along with a sophisticated public relations programme.

Conclusions: The strategies of the tobacco industry have been largely successful in inhibiting the regulation of secondhand smoke in Germany. Policymakers, health professionals, the media and the general public should be aware of this industry involvement and should take appropriate steps to close the gap between what is known and what is done about the health effects of secondhand smoke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interest to disclose.

References

    1. Lickint F. Tabak und Tabakrauch als aetiologischer Factor des Carcinoms. Zeitschrift fuer Krebsforschung 1929(30)349–365.
    1. Fichtenberg C, Glantz S. Effect of smoke‐free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review. BMJ 2002325188–194. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grüning T, Gilmore A, McKee M. Tobacco industry influence on science and scientists in Germany. Am J Public Health 20069620–32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neuman M, Bitton A, Glantz S. Tobacco industry strategies for influencing European Community tobacco advertising legislation. Lancet 20023591323–1330. - PubMed
    1. Lehman K. Chemische und toxikologische Studien über Tabak, Tabakrauch und das Tabakrauchen. Archiv für Hygiene 190968321–420.

Publication types

Substances