Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Apr;44(4):373-7.
doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000204281.42465.11.

Implications of new geriatric diabetes care guidelines for the assessment of quality of care in older patients

Elbert S Huang  1 , Greg A Sachs, Marshall H Chin
Affiliations

Implications of new geriatric diabetes care guidelines for the assessment of quality of care in older patients

Elbert S Huang et al. Med Care. 2006 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Current approaches to assessing quality of diabetes care do not account for the heterogeneity of older patients.

Objective: We sought to compare conclusions regarding adequacy of glucose and blood pressure control using current quality assessment approaches and a stratified approach based on geriatric care guidelines.

Design: This was a cross-sectional evaluation of diabetes care.

Subjects: We studied patients older than 65, living with diabetes (n = 554) attending clinics of an academic medical center.

Measurements: We measured the proportion of patients with and without markers of poor health (life expectancy < or = 5 years, age > or = 85, 4-6 activities of daily living dependencies, or Charlson Comorbidity Index Score > or = 5) achieving treatment goals.

Results: Under general population goals (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1C] < or = 6.5% or < 7%; systolic blood pressure [SBP] < 130 mm Hg), a small proportion of our subjects met glucose (24-36%) or SBP control (30%) targets. Under new guidelines, less-intense targets (HbA1C < or = 8%, SBP < 140 mm Hg) would be applied to patients with diminished health, with general population goals reserved for healthier patients. With this stratified approach, the proportion of sicker patients achieving their specified glucose (61-83%) and SBP goals (37-64%) generally was high, depending on the criteria for poor health, whereas the proportion of healthier patients achieving their goals remained low.

Conclusions: A stratified approach to assessing the quality of diabetes care leads to distinct care conclusions for older patients with and without markers of diminished health. An approach to quality assessment and quality improvement that acknowledges patient heterogeneity could help ensure the clinical relevance of such efforts for older patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cowie CC, Eberhardt MS. Sociodemographic characteristics of persons with diabetes. In: Harris M, editor. Diabetes in America. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 1995. pp. 85–116.
    1. Blaum CS. Management of diabetes mellitus in older adults: are national guidelines appropriate? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:581–583. - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(Suppl 1):S15–S35. - PubMed
    1. Brown AF, Mangione CM, Saliba D, et al. California Healthcare Foundation/American Geriatrics Society Panel on Improving Care for Elders with Diabetes. Guidlines for improving the care of the older person with diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(5 Suppl Guidelines):S265–S280. - PubMed
    1. Fleming BB, Greenfield S, Engelgau MM, et al. for the DQIP Group. The diabetes quality improvement project. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1815–1820. - PubMed

Publication types