Porous block hydroxyapatite in orthognathic surgery
- PMID: 1656815
- DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1991)061<0185:PBHIOS>2.0.CO;2
Porous block hydroxyapatite in orthognathic surgery
Abstract
Seventy-six nonconsecutive patients undergoing orthognathic surgery, in whom blocks of porous hydroxyapatite were implanted into osteotomy gaps in lieu of autogenous bone grafts, are the subjects of this report. Surgical procedures include inferior maxillary repositioning (10 patients), maxillary advancement (24 patients), transverse maxillary expansions (17 patients) and inferior repositioning of the chin (25 patients). A total of 140 anatomic sites were implanted. Eleven patients later consented to open biopsy of the implant material at a mean 10.2 months following implantation. At the time of follow-up, mean 16.3 months, excellent osseous stability was observed. Three patients developed complications relative to the presence of the implant. Twenty-one of 24 biopsy specimens demonstrated an osseous union of implant to bone with osseous deposition within the implant pores. Radiographic follow-up revealed implant blocks to maintain their volume with no change in density or discreteness. The biological behavior and biomechanical properties of porous block hydroxyapatite are discussed. These implant characteristics make it a feasible bone graft substitute in orthognathic surgery and justify its continued use in this context.
Similar articles
-
Porous, block hydroxyapatite as an interpositional bone graft substitute in orthognathic surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989 Jun;83(6):985-90; discussion 991-3. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989. PMID: 2727171
-
Stability of maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and porous-block hydroxyapatite grafting: cleft palate versus non-cleft patients.Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2001 Fall;16(3):193-9. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2001. PMID: 12387610
-
Coralline porous hydroxyapatite as a bone graft substitute in orthognathic surgery: 24-month follow-up results.Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1989;4(2):105-17. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1989. PMID: 2561745
-
Maxillofacial osteotomies for patients with cleft lip and palate.Clin Plast Surg. 1989 Oct;16(4):803-14. Clin Plast Surg. 1989. PMID: 2680222 Review.
-
Polydimethylsiloxane for augmentation of the chin, malar, and nasal bones.J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1998;8(1):55-67. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1998. PMID: 10177459 Review.
Cited by
-
The fate of porous hydroxyapatite granules used in facial skeletal augmentation.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010 Aug;34(4):455-61. doi: 10.1007/s00266-010-9473-2. Epub 2010 Feb 26. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010. PMID: 20186415 Free PMC article.
-
Low temperature fabrication of magnesium phosphate cement scaffolds by 3D powder printing.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010 Nov;21(11):2947-53. doi: 10.1007/s10856-010-4148-8. Epub 2010 Aug 26. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010. PMID: 20740307
-
In-Vivo Degradation Behavior and Osseointegration of 3D Powder-Printed Calcium Magnesium Phosphate Cement Scaffolds.Materials (Basel). 2021 Feb 17;14(4):946. doi: 10.3390/ma14040946. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33671265 Free PMC article.
-
Fabrication of Poly-l-lactic Acid/Dicalcium Phosphate Dihydrate Composite Scaffolds with High Mechanical Strength-Implications for Bone Tissue Engineering.J Funct Biomater. 2015 Nov 4;6(4):1036-53. doi: 10.3390/jfb6041036. J Funct Biomater. 2015. PMID: 26556380 Free PMC article.
-
Low temperature method for the production of calcium phosphate fillers.Biomed Eng Online. 2004 Mar 22;3(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-3-8. Biomed Eng Online. 2004. PMID: 15035671 Free PMC article.