Children's attributions of intentions to an invisible agent
- PMID: 16569164
- DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.253
Children's attributions of intentions to an invisible agent
Abstract
Children ages 3-9 years were informed that an invisible agent (Princess Alice) would help them play a forced-choice game by "telling them, somehow, when they chose the wrong box," whereas a matched control group of children were not given this supernatural prime. On 2 unexpected event trials, an experimenter triggered a simulated unexpected event (i.e., a light turning on/off; a picture falling), and children's behavioral response to these events (i.e., moving their hand to the opposite box) was coded. Results showed a significant Age GroupxExperimental Condition interaction; the only children to reliably alter their behavior in response to the unexpected events were the oldest children (M=7 years 4 months), who were primed with the invisible agent concept. For children's posttest verbal explanations, also, only these children saw the unexpected events as being referential and declarative (e.g., "Princess Alice did it because I chose the wrong box"). Together, these data suggest that children may not regularly begin to see communicative signs as embedded in unexpected events until they are around 7 years of age.
Copyright (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
"Princess Alice is watching you": children's belief in an invisible person inhibits cheating.J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Jul;109(3):311-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Mar 5. J Exp Child Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21377689 Clinical Trial.
-
Hostile attributions and behavioral strategies in children: does relationship type matter?Dev Psychol. 2007 Jul;43(4):889-900. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.889. Dev Psychol. 2007. PMID: 17605522
-
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007. PMID: 17394580
-
Tomboys: meanings, marginalization, and misunderstandings.Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2008 Jun;29(6):555-65. doi: 10.1080/01612840802048691. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18569204 Review.
-
Children's understanding of psychological problems displayed by their peers: a review of the literature.Child Care Health Dev. 2008 Jan;34(1):4-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2007.00772.x. Child Care Health Dev. 2008. PMID: 18171437 Review.
Cited by
-
Reasoning about knowledge: Children's evaluations of generality and verifiability.Cogn Psychol. 2015 Dec;83:22-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Oct 8. Cogn Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26451884 Free PMC article.
-
Confronting, Representing, and Believing Counterintuitive Concepts: Navigating the Natural and the Supernatural.Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Mar;9(2):144-60. doi: 10.1177/1745691613518078. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014. PMID: 24683418 Free PMC article.
-
More Things in Heaven and Earth: Spirit Possession, Mental Disorder, and Intentionality.J Med Humanit. 2020 Sep;41(3):363-378. doi: 10.1007/s10912-018-9519-z. J Med Humanit. 2020. PMID: 30027384 Free PMC article.
-
Learning from others: children's construction of concepts.Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:115-40. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093659. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009. PMID: 18631027 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The development of children's concepts of invisibility.Cogn Dev. 2015 Apr-Jun;34:63-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.009. Cogn Dev. 2015. PMID: 25937704 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical