Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Mar;42(2):319-31.
doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.319.

Relations between neighborhood factors, parenting behaviors, peer deviance, and delinquency among serious juvenile offenders

Affiliations

Relations between neighborhood factors, parenting behaviors, peer deviance, and delinquency among serious juvenile offenders

He Len Chung et al. Dev Psychol. 2006 Mar.

Abstract

The present study examined relations among neighborhood structural and social characteristics, parenting practices, peer group affiliations, and delinquency among a group of serious adolescent offenders. The sample of 14-18-year-old boys (N=488) was composed primarily of economically disadvantaged, ethnic-minority youth living in urban communities. The results indicate that weak neighborhood social organization is indirectly related to delinquency through its associations with parenting behavior and peer deviance and that a focus on just 1 of these microsystems can lead to oversimplified models of risk for juvenile offending. The authors also find that community social ties may confer both pro- and antisocial influences to youth, and they advocate for a broad conceptualization of neighborhood social processes as these relate to developmental risk for youth living in disadvantaged communities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hypothesized model of adolescent offending.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Standardized estimates for the final model predicting individual offending. An effective sample size (N = 310) used to test the structural model, χ2(37, N = 310) = 45.13, ns (RMSEA = .027, p[close] = .95, CFI = .996); all three neighborhood structural factors were allowed to correlate with each other and with parental education. p < .10. *p < .05. ***p < .001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson E. Code of the streets: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: Norton; 1999.
    1. Arbuckle JL. AMOS for Windows: Analysis of moment structures (Version 5) [Computer software and manual] Chicago: Smallwaters; 1999.
    1. Barcikowski RS. Statistical power with a group mean as a unit of analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics. 1981;6:267–285.
    1. Baron RM, Kenny D. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51:1173–1182. - PubMed
    1. Bellair P. Social interaction and community crime: Examining the importance of neighborhood networks. Criminology. 1997;35:677–703.

Publication types