Toward a treaty on safety and cost-effectiveness of pharmaceuticals and medical devices: enhancing an endangered global public good
- PMID: 16569240
- PMCID: PMC1513209
- DOI: 10.1186/1744-8603-2-5
Toward a treaty on safety and cost-effectiveness of pharmaceuticals and medical devices: enhancing an endangered global public good
Abstract
Expert evaluations of the safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of pharmaceutical and medical devices, prior to marketing approval or reimbursement listing, collectively represent a globally important public good. The scientific processes involved play a major role in protecting the public from product risks such as unintended or adverse events, sub-standard production and unnecessary burdens on individual and governmental healthcare budgets. Most States now have an increasing policy interest in this area, though institutional arrangements, particularly in the area of cost-effectiveness analysis of medical devices, are not uniformly advanced and are fragile in the face of opposing multinational industry pressure to recoup investment and maintain profit margins. This paper examines the possibility, in this context, of States commencing negotiations toward bilateral trade agreement provisions, and ultimately perhaps a multilateral Treaty, on safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmaceuticals and medical devices. Such obligations may robustly facilitate a conceptually interlinked, but endangered, global public good, without compromising the capacity of intellectual property laws to facilitate local product innovations.
Similar articles
-
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023. Ann Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 36969097 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Guidelines, editors, pharma and the biological paradigm shift.Mens Sana Monogr. 2007 Jan;5(1):27-30. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.32176. Mens Sana Monogr. 2007. PMID: 22058616 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the impact of the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement on Australian and global medicines policy.Global Health. 2005 Oct 6;1:15. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-1-15. Global Health. 2005. PMID: 16209703 Free PMC article.
-
Analyzing the impact of trade and investment agreements on pharmaceutical policy: provisions, pathways and potential impacts.Global Health. 2019 Nov 28;15(Suppl 1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0518-2. Global Health. 2019. PMID: 31775767 Free PMC article.
-
USMCA (NAFTA 2.0): tightening the constraints on the right to regulate for public health.Global Health. 2019 May 14;15(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0476-8. Global Health. 2019. PMID: 31088499 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Three Proposals for Rewarding Novel Health Technologies Benefiting People Living in Poverty. A Comparative Analysis of Prize Funds, Health Impact Funds and a Cost-Effectiveness/Competitive Tender Treaty.Public Health Ethics. 2008 Jul;1(2):146-153. doi: 10.1093/phe/phn013. Epub 2008 May 3. Public Health Ethics. 2008. PMID: 19461854 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges for Australia's Bio/Nanopharma Policies: trade deals, public goods and reference pricing in sustainable industrial renewal.Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 Jun 1;4:9. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-9. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007. PMID: 17543114 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Faunce TA. 'Global Intellectual Property Protection for Innovative Pharmaceuticals: Challenges for Bioethics and Health Law'. In: Bennett B, Tomossy GF, editor. Globalisation and Health. Springer. Dordrecht; 2005.
-
- Berger , et al. Health Care Cost, Quality and Outcomes. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Lawrenceville NJ; 2003.
-
- Berger , et al. Health Care Cost, Quality and Outcomes. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Lawrenceville NJ. European Economic Community, Medical Device Directive Council Directive 93/42/EEC; 2003. 14 June 1993.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources