[Control of methicillin-resistant S. aureus by active surveillance. Results of a workshop held by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie]
- PMID: 16570167
- DOI: 10.1007/s00101-006-1016-5
[Control of methicillin-resistant S. aureus by active surveillance. Results of a workshop held by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie]
Abstract
In Germany, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is increasing continuously. To control the spread of MRSA, active surveillance and admission screening are recommended. In most cases, screening cultures of patients at risk for MRSA will be sufficient. Screening of all patients admitted to an ICU is cost-effective when the incidence of MRSA and nosocomial MRSA infections is high (>2 cases/100 patients and 0.3 MRSA infections/100 patients, respectively): Under these circumstances, a decrease in the incidence of nosocomial MRSA infections of 50% leads to cost-effectiveness at costs of 16 Euro/sample (including subsequent costs). If the incidence of nosocomial MRSA infections decreases by 75%, costs of 24 Euro/sample (including subsequent costs) are cost-effective. If the incidence of MRSA is high, screening by PCR may be cost-effective for patients at high risk for MRSA, especially if they are isolated prophylactically. Recently, PCR methods have been developed which allow the specific identification of MRSA even from nasal swabs.
Similar articles
-
Screening high-risk patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on admission to the hospital: is it cost effective?Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999 Jul;20(7):473-7. doi: 10.1086/501655. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999. PMID: 10432159
-
Effect of targeted surveillance for control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a community hospital system.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Mar;27(3):233-8. doi: 10.1086/500372. Epub 2006 Mar 6. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006. PMID: 16532409
-
Active screening in high-risk units is an effective and cost-avoidant method to reduce the rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in the hospital.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;27(10):1009-17. doi: 10.1086/507915. Epub 2006 Sep 20. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006. PMID: 17006806
-
Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the endemic hospital: what have we learned?J Hosp Infect. 2001 Jan;47(1):9-18. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2000.0873. J Hosp Infect. 2001. PMID: 11161895 Review.
-
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): is there a need to change clinical practice?Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2000 Dec;16(6):357-66. doi: 10.1054/iccn.2000.1527. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2000. PMID: 11091467 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost comparison of MRSA screening and management - a decision tree analysis.BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec 1;12:438. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-438. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012. PMID: 23198880 Free PMC article.
-
Transmission rates, screening methods and costs of MRSA--a systematic literature review related to the prevalence in Germany.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Oct;31(10):2497-511. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1632-8. Epub 2012 May 10. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012. PMID: 22573360
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical