Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jun;35(6):390-3.
doi: 10.1007/s00256-006-0106-4. Epub 2006 Mar 30.

Surgical planning of total hip arthroplasty: accuracy of computer-assisted EndoMap software in predicting component size

Affiliations

Surgical planning of total hip arthroplasty: accuracy of computer-assisted EndoMap software in predicting component size

Jesse A Davila et al. Skeletal Radiol. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of a computer-assisted templating in the surgical planning of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty utilizing EndoMap software (Siemans AG, Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Endomap Software is an electronic program that uses DICOM images to analyze standard anteroposterior radiographs for determination of optimal prosthesis component size.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative radiographs of 36 patients undergoing uncomplicated primary total hip arthroplasty, utilizing EndoMap software, Version VA20. DICOM anteroposterior radiographs were analyzed using standard manufacturer supplied electronic templates to determine acetabular and femoral component sizes. No additional clinical information was reviewed. Acetabular and femoral component sizes were assessed by an orthopedic surgeon and two radiologists. Mean and estimated component size was compared with component size as documented in operative reports.

Results: The mean estimated acetabular component size was 53 mm (range 48-60 mm), 1 mm larger than the mean implanted size of 52 mm (range 48-62 mm). Thirty-one of 36 acetabular component sizes (86%) were accurate within one size. The mean calculated femoral component size was 4 (range 2-7), 1 size smaller than the actual mean component size of 5 (range 2-9). Twenty-six of 36 femoral component sizes (72%) were accurate within one size, and accurate within two sizes in all but four cases (94%).

Conclusion: EndoMap Software predicted femoral component size well, with 72% within one component size of that used, and 94% within two sizes. Acetabular component size was predicted slightly better with 86% within one component size and 94% within two component sizes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Jan;20(1):51-8 - PubMed
    1. J Arthroplasty. 1992;7 Suppl:403-9 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Jan;(274):12-21 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A Suppl 2:118-22 - PubMed
    1. J Digit Imaging. 1999 May;12(2 Suppl 1):155-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources