Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006;29(1):32-8.
doi: 10.1080/10790268.2006.11753854.

Efficacy of surgical decompression in regard to motor recovery in the setting of conus medullaris injury

Affiliations

Efficacy of surgical decompression in regard to motor recovery in the setting of conus medullaris injury

Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar et al. J Spinal Cord Med. 2006.

Abstract

Background/objective: An assessment of neurological improvement after surgical intervention in the setting of traumatic conus medullaris injury (CMI).

Methods: A retrospective evaluation of a cohort of patients with a blunt traumatic CMI from T12 to L1. The neurologic and functional outcomes were recorded from the acute hospital admission to the most recent follow-up. Data collected included age, level of injury, neurologic examination according to the Frankel grading system and motor index score, and the mechanism and timing of CMI decompression.

Results: A total of 24 patients with a mean age of 27 years (men, 87%) were identified. The most common level of bony injury was L1, and the most frequent mechanism of injury was a motor vehicle crash. Before surgical intervention, 16 of 24 patients (66.7%) had a complete neurological deficit below the level of injury. The median interval from injury to surgery was 6 days (range, 7 hours to 390 days). Decompression, fusion, and adjunctive internal fixation were the most common surgical procedures. Median length of follow-up was 32 months after surgery. Improvement in spinal cord and bladder function was seen in 41.6% and 63.6% of patients, respectively. Root recovery was seen in 83.3% of patients.

Conclusions: In the setting of CMI, no correlation between the timing of surgical decompression and motor improvement was identified. Root recovery was more predictable than spinal cord and bladder recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kiwerski J, Weiss M. Neurological improvement in traumatic injuries of cervical spinal cord. Paraplegia. 1981;19:31–37. - PubMed
    1. Fehlings MG, Sekhon LHS, Tator C. The role and timing of decompression in acute spinal cord injury: what do we know? What should we do? Spine. 2001;26:S101–S110. - PubMed
    1. Fehlings MG, Tator CH. An evidence-based review of surgical decompression for acute spinal cord injury: rationale, indications, and timing based on experimental and clinical studies. J Neurosurg (Spine) 1999;91:1–11. - PubMed
    1. Kraus JF, Franti CE, Riggins RS, Richards D, Borhani NO. Incidence of traumatic spinal cord lesions. J Chronic Dis. 1975;28:471–492. - PubMed
    1. Rizzolo SJ, Vaccaro AR, Cotler JM. Cervical spine trauma. Spine. 1994;19:2288–2298. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms