Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 May;194(5):1438-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.057. Epub 2006 Mar 30.

The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support

Aimee Summers  1 , Lisa A Winkel, Hero K Hussain, John O L DeLancey
Affiliations

The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support

Aimee Summers et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the degree of anterior compartment (bladder) and apical compartment (cervix) prolapse are correlated, and whether 2 anterior compartment elements (urethra and bladder) are related at maximal Valsalva.

Study design: Women with a complete spectrum of pelvic support were recruited for a pelvic support study. Dynamic magnetic resonance scans were taken during Valsalva. A convenience sample of 153 women with a mean age of 53.3 +/- 12.5 (SD) years with a uterus in situ was studied. Anterior compartment status was assessed by the most caudal bladder point and the internal urinary meatus. The external cervical os was used to assess the apical compartment. The position of the bladder, urethra, and uterus were determined in 20 nulliparous women to determine their reference locations. The distances of each structure below the reference positions were calculated at maximum Valsalva.

Results: Average distances of the bladder base, urethra, and uterus from the reference positions at maximal Valsalva were 4.1 +/- 2.4 cm, 3.1 +/- 1.3 cm, and 4.3 +/- 2.4 cm, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient of the relationship between the bladder base and uterine distances was r = 0.73 (r2 = 0.53). The Pearson correlation coefficient of the bladder distance and urethral distance was r = 0.82 (r2 = 0.67).

Conclusion: Half of the observed variation in anterior compartment support may be explained by apical support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Left panel shows a sagittal section of a woman with a descent of the bladder (B) and uterus (U). The arrows point to the sacro-coccygeal articulation dorsally and the inferior pubic point ventrally. The right panel shows the SCIPP line (x-axis) and the perpendicular y-axis, most caudal bladder point (closed circle), internal urinary meatus (open circle), and external cervical os (triangle).
Figure 2
Figure 2
A, Uterine descent without bladder descent. B, Bladder and urethra both descend without uterus. C, Similar descent of the bladder and uterus with noticeably less decent of the urethra in contrast to B. Note, when bladder base and urethra are in the same location, a single mark is shown.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Location of the bladder and uterus at rest and at maximal Valsalva.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Enlarged view of the urethra and bladder locations at rest and maximal Valsalva. Because of co-localization, the “normal” position of the bladder and urethra are the same. The figures were enlarged compared with Figure 3 in order to show the overlap of the bladder and urethral locations. In doing so, the most dependent bladder point during maximal Valsalva is not shown.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Correlation between bladder and uterus. The distance between the “normal” location and the position during maximal Valsalva maneuver for both the most caudal point of the bladder and the external cervical os.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Correlation between bladder and urethra. The distance between the “normal” location and the position during maximal Valsalva maneuver for both the most caudal point of the bladder and the internal urinary meatus.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Boyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L. Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:108–15. - PubMed
    1. DeLancey JO. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jun;166:1717–24. discussion 1724-8. - PubMed
    1. Miller NF, Evans TN, Haas RL. Human parturition: normal and abnormal labor. The Williams & Wilkins Company; Baltimore: 1958. p. 18.
    1. DeLancey JO. Fascial and muscular abnormalities in women with urethral hypermobility and anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:93–8. - PubMed
    1. Richardson AC, Lyon JB, Williams NL. A new look at pelvic relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;126:568–73. - PubMed

Publication types