Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Mar 10;8(1):E112-7.
doi: 10.1208/aapsj080113.

Activation of G-proteins in brain by endogenous and exogenous cannabinoids

Affiliations
Review

Activation of G-proteins in brain by endogenous and exogenous cannabinoids

Steven R Childers. AAPS J. .

Abstract

The biological response to cannabinoid agonist begins when the agonist-bound receptor activates G-protein G(alpha) subunits, thus initiating a cascade of signal transduction pathways. For this reason, information about cannabinoid receptors/G-protein coupling is critical to understand both the acute and chronic actions of cannabinoids. This review focuses on these mechanisms, predominantly examining the ability of cannabinoid agonists to activate G-proteins in brain with agonist-stimulated [(35)S]guanylyl-5'-O-(gamma-thio)-triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding. Acute efficacies of cannabinoid agonists at the level of G-protein activation depend not only on the ability of the agonist to induce a high affinity state in G(alpha) for GTP, but also to induce a low affinity for GDP. When several agonists are compared, it is clear that cannabinoid agonists differ considerably in their efficacy. Both WIN 55212-2 and levonantradol are full agonists, while Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol is a weak partial agonist. Of interest, anandamide and its stable analog methanandamide are partial agonists. Chronic treatment in vivo with cannabinoids produces significant tolerance to the physiological and behavioral effects of these drugs, and several studies have shown that this is accompanied by a significant loss in the ability of cannabinoid receptors to couple to G-proteins in brain. These effects vary across different brain regions and are usually (but not always) accompanied by loss of cannabinoid receptor binding. Although the relationship between cannabinoid receptor desensitization and tolerance has not yet been established, these mechanisms may represent events that lead to a loss of cannabinoid agonist response and development of tolerance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Howlett AC. Inhibition of neuroblastoma adenylyl cyclase by cannabinoid and nantradol compounds. Life Sci. 1984;35:1803–1810. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(84)90278-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howlett AC, Fleming RM. Cannabinoid inhibition of adenylate cyclase: pharmacology of the response in neuroblastoma cell membranes. Mol Pharmacol. 1984;26:532–538. - PubMed
    1. Howlett AC. Cannabinoid inhibition of adenylate cyclase: biochemistry of the response in neuroblastoma cell membranes. Mol Pharmacol. 1985;27:429–436. - PubMed
    1. Howlett AC, Qualy JM, Khachatrian LL. Involvement of Gi in the inhibition of adenylate cyclase by cannabimimetic drugs. Mol Pharmacol. 1986;29:307–313. - PubMed
    1. Devane WA, Dysarz FAI, Johnson MR, Melvin LS, Howlett AC. Determination and characterization of a cannabinoid receptor in rat brain. Mol Pharmacol. 1988;34:605–613. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources