Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2006 May 13;332(7550):1115-24.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38793.468449.AE. Epub 2006 Apr 3.

Efficacy of lipid lowering drug treatment for diabetic and non-diabetic patients: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of lipid lowering drug treatment for diabetic and non-diabetic patients: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

João Costa et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical benefit of lipid lowering drug treatment in patients with and without diabetes mellitus, for primary and secondary prevention.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: Cochrane, Medline, Embase, and reference lists up to April 2004.

Study selection: Randomised, placebo controlled, double blind trials with a follow-up of at least three years that evaluated lipid lowering drug treatment in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

Data extraction: Two independent reviewers extracted data. The primary outcome was major coronary events defined as coronary heart disease death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or myocardial revascularisation procedures.

Results: Twelve studies were included. Lipid lowering drug treatment was found to be at least as effective in diabetic patients as in non-diabetic patients. In primary prevention, the risk reduction for major coronary events was 21% (95% confidence interval 11% to 30%; P < 0.0001) in diabetic patients and 23% (12% to 33%; P = 0.0003) in non-diabetic patients. In secondary prevention, the corresponding risk reductions were 21% (10% to 31%; P = 0.0005) and 23% (19% to 26%; P < or = 0.00001). However, the absolute risk difference was three times higher in secondary prevention. When results were adjusted for baseline risk, diabetic patients benefited more in both primary and secondary prevention. Blood lipids were reduced to a similar degree in both groups.

Conclusions: The evidence that lipid lowering drug treatment (especially statins) significantly reduce cardiovascular risk in diabetic and non-diabetic patients is strong and suggests that diabetic patients benefit more, in both primary and secondary prevention. Future research should define the threshold for treatment of these patients and the desired target lipid concentrations, especially for primary prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Event rate for major coronary events in primary prevention trials (mean weighted follow-up 4.5 years)
Fig 2
Fig 2
Event rate for major coronary events in secondary prevention trials (mean weighted follow-up 5.1 years)
Fig 3
Fig 3
Primary prevention of major coronary events
Fig 4
Fig 4
Secondary prevention of major coronary events
Fig 5
Fig 5
Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease death
Fig 6
Fig 6
Secondary prevention of non-fatal myocardial infarction
Fig 7
Fig 7
Secondary prevention of myocardial revascularisation procedures (coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty)
Fig 8
Fig 8
Secondary prevention of stroke
Fig 9
Fig 9
Change in blood lipid concentrations. HDL-C=high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C=low density lipoprotein cholesterol (no data for total cholesterol were available in VA-HIT)

Comment in

References

    1. Beckman JA, Creager MA, Libby P. Diabetes and atherosclerosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. JAMA 2002;287: 2570-81. - PubMed
    1. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1998;339: 229-34. - PubMed
    1. Miettinen H, Lehto S, Salomaa V, Mahonen M, Niemela M, Haffner SM, et al. Impact of diabetes on mortality after the first myocardial infarction. Diabetes Care 1998;21: 69-75. - PubMed
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 1998;352: 854-65. - PubMed
    1. Turner R, Cull C, Holman R. United Kingdom prospective diabetes study 17: a 9-year update of a randomized, controlled trial on the effect of improved metabolic control on complications in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 1996;124: 136-45. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms