Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Apr;15(2):81-4.
doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014969.

Development of the Leapfrog methodology for evaluating hospital implemented inpatient computerized physician order entry systems

Affiliations

Development of the Leapfrog methodology for evaluating hospital implemented inpatient computerized physician order entry systems

P M Kilbridge et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Apr.

Abstract

The 1999 Institute of Medicine report raised public awareness of the frequency and cost of adverse drug events in medicine. In response, in November 2000 a coalition of healthcare purchasers announced the formation of the Leapfrog Group, an organization dedicated to making "great leaps forward" in the safety and quality of health care in America. Their first target-computerized physician order entry (CPOE)-was selected specifically for its potential to reduce harm to patients from medications. The Leapfrog inpatient CPOE standard included a requirement that the organization operating CPOE should demonstrate via a test that their inpatient CPOE system can alert physicians to at least 50% of common serious prescribing errors. This paper outlines the development of this test which evaluates the ability of implemented CPOE systems to prevent the occurrence of medication errors that have a high likelihood of leading to adverse drug events. A framework was developed to include 12 different categories of CPOE based decision support that could prevent prescribing errors leading to adverse drug events. A scoring system was developed based on the known frequency and severity of adverse drug events. Simulated test patients and accompanying simulated test medication orders were developed to evaluate the ability of a CPOE system to intercept prescribing errors in all 12 decision support categories. The test was validated at a number of inpatient sites using both commercially available and custom developed CPOE systems. A web based application was developed to allow hospitals to self-administer the evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: none.

References

    1. Leape L L, Brennan T A, Laird N.et al The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med 1991324377–384. - PubMed
    1. Jha A K, Kuperman G J, Teich J M.et al Identifying adverse drug events: development of a computer‐based monitor and comparison with chart review and stimulated voluntary report. J Am Med Inform Assoc 19985305–314. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rozich J D, Haraden C R, Resar R K. Adverse drug event trigger tool: a practical methodology for measuring medication related harm. Qual Saf Health Care 200312194–200. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Classen D C, Pestotnik S L, Evans R S.et al Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA 1997277301–306. - PubMed
    1. Bates D W, Spell N, Cullen D J.et al The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group. JAMA 1997277307–311. - PubMed

MeSH terms