Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening
- PMID: 16586444
- DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21955
Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening
Abstract
Several studies suggest that HPV testing is more sensitive than cytology in primary cervical screening. These studies had different designs and were reported in different ways. Individual patient data were collected for all European and North American studies in which cytology was routinely performed and HPV testing was included as an additional parallel test. More than 60,000 women were included. The sensitivity and specificity of HPV testing were compared with routine cytology, both overall and for ages <35, 35-49 and 50+. The age-specific prevalence of high risk HPV (hr-HPV) was also analysed. HPV testing was substantially more sensitive in detecting CIN2+ than cytology (96.1% vs. 53.0%) but less specific (90.7% vs. 96.3%). The sensitivity of HPV testing was similar in all studies carried out in different areas of Europe and North America, whereas the sensitivity of cytology was highly variable. HPV sensitivity was uniformly high at all ages, whereas the sensitivity of cytology was substantially better in women over the age of 50 than in younger women (79.3% vs. 59.6%). The specificity of both tests increased with age. Positivity rates for HPV testing in women without high-grade CIN were region dependent. These results support the use of HPV testing as the sole primary screening test, with cytology reserved for women who test HPV positive. Large demonstration projects are needed to fully evaluate this strategy.
Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Self-collection of vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer prevention (MARCH): a community-based randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2011 Nov 26;378(9806):1868-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61522-5. Epub 2011 Nov 1. Lancet. 2011. PMID: 22051739 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.BJOG. 2004 Aug;111(8):842-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00210.x. BJOG. 2004. PMID: 15270934
-
Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer.Vaccine. 2012 Nov 20;30 Suppl 5:F88-99. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.095. Vaccine. 2012. PMID: 23199969 Review.
-
Human papillomavirus testing for primary cervical cancer screening.Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2008 Sep;8(5):599-605. doi: 10.1586/14737159.8.5.599. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2008. PMID: 18785808 Review.
-
Colposcopy is not necessary to assess the risk to the cervix in HIV-positive women: an international cohort study of cervical pathology in HIV-1 positive women.Int J Cancer. 2007 Dec 1;121(11):2484-91. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22947. Int J Cancer. 2007. PMID: 17683070
Cited by
-
Primary screening for human papillomavirus compared with cytology screening for cervical cancer in European settings: cost effectiveness analysis based on a Dutch microsimulation model.BMJ. 2012 Mar 5;344:e670. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e670. BMJ. 2012. PMID: 22391612 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Different Cervical Screening Strategies in Islamic Republic of Iran: A Middle-Income Country with a Low Incidence Rate of Cervical Cancer.PLoS One. 2016 Jun 8;11(6):e0156705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156705. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27276093 Free PMC article.
-
Performance and acceptability of self-collected human papillomavirus testing among women living with HIV.Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;99:452-457. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.07.047. Epub 2020 Jul 30. Int J Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 32738484 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of human-papillomavirus screening for cervical cancer in China's rural population.PeerJ. 2019 Dec 20;7:e8152. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8152. eCollection 2019. PeerJ. 2019. PMID: 31875147 Free PMC article.
-
Human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening: practical aspects in developing countries.Mol Diagn Ther. 2010 Aug 1;14(4):215-22. doi: 10.1007/BF03256376. Mol Diagn Ther. 2010. PMID: 20799763 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical