Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Oct;32(10):1188-91.
doi: 10.1136/gut.32.10.1188.

Cytodiagnosis in the management of extrahepatic biliary stricture

Affiliations

Cytodiagnosis in the management of extrahepatic biliary stricture

L A Desa et al. Gut. 1991 Oct.

Abstract

A total of 117 patients presenting with extrahepatic biliary strictures between 1981 and 1989 had 206 cytological examinations of the bile duct or bile (153 non-operative, 53 intraoperative) to establish the presence of malignancy. A final diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma was made in 88 patients, with 29 patients having benign biliary strictures. The cytological techniques used were fine needle aspiration (n = 102) or brushing (n = 24) of the bile duct, or exfoliative cytology of bile (n = 80). Forty one patients with malignancy had two or more examinations with differing results between samples in 20 cases. The overall sensitivity was 72%. There was only one false positive result, giving a patient predictive value of positive cytology of 98%. Intraoperative cytology was more sensitive than non-operative examination (80% v 42%). Overall, the sensitivity of fine needle aspiration (67%) was greater than that of brush cytology (40%) or exfoliative cytology (30%). No complications were encountered. Cytodiagnosis of extrahepatic biliary strictures is a safe procedure which is not technically demanding, and as it has a high sensitivity and predictive value for positive cytology, cytological confirmation of malignancy should be sought in all clinically and radiologically suspicious cases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Radiology. 1988 Nov;169(2):555-6 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1975;10(8):829-31 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1989 Aug;76(8):849-52 - PubMed
    1. Acta Chir Scand. 1988 Jan;154(1):77-9 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Aug;147(2):399-403 - PubMed