Cytodiagnosis in the management of extrahepatic biliary stricture
- PMID: 1659552
- PMCID: PMC1379383
- DOI: 10.1136/gut.32.10.1188
Cytodiagnosis in the management of extrahepatic biliary stricture
Abstract
A total of 117 patients presenting with extrahepatic biliary strictures between 1981 and 1989 had 206 cytological examinations of the bile duct or bile (153 non-operative, 53 intraoperative) to establish the presence of malignancy. A final diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma was made in 88 patients, with 29 patients having benign biliary strictures. The cytological techniques used were fine needle aspiration (n = 102) or brushing (n = 24) of the bile duct, or exfoliative cytology of bile (n = 80). Forty one patients with malignancy had two or more examinations with differing results between samples in 20 cases. The overall sensitivity was 72%. There was only one false positive result, giving a patient predictive value of positive cytology of 98%. Intraoperative cytology was more sensitive than non-operative examination (80% v 42%). Overall, the sensitivity of fine needle aspiration (67%) was greater than that of brush cytology (40%) or exfoliative cytology (30%). No complications were encountered. Cytodiagnosis of extrahepatic biliary strictures is a safe procedure which is not technically demanding, and as it has a high sensitivity and predictive value for positive cytology, cytological confirmation of malignancy should be sought in all clinically and radiologically suspicious cases.
Similar articles
-
Monocentric study of bile aspiration associated with biliary brushing performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 239 patients with symptomatic biliary stricture.Cancer Cytopathol. 2016 May;124(5):330-9. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21667. Epub 2015 Dec 23. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016. PMID: 26700399
-
Fine needle aspiration cytology and exfoliative biliary cytology in the diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.Eur J Surg Oncol. 1986 Jun;12(2):143-5. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1986. PMID: 3011516
-
Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited.Acta Cytol. 2016;60(2):167-72. doi: 10.1159/000446149. Epub 2016 May 25. Acta Cytol. 2016. PMID: 27221813
-
Biliary brushing cytology.Cytopathology. 2004 Apr;15(2):74-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2004.00133.x. Cytopathology. 2004. PMID: 15056166 Review.
-
Beyond cytomorphology: expanding the diagnostic potential for biliary cytology.Diagn Cytopathol. 2012 Jun;40(6):536-41. doi: 10.1002/dc.22839. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012. PMID: 22619128 Review.
Cited by
-
Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico-biliary strictures: a review of 406 cases.J Clin Pathol. 2001 Jun;54(6):449-55. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.6.449. J Clin Pathol. 2001. PMID: 11376018 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma: Advances and current limitations.World J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 10;2(5):203-16. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v2.i5.203. World J Clin Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21611097 Free PMC article.
-
Biliary Tree Diagnostics: Advances in Endoscopic Imaging and Tissue Sampling.Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jan 17;58(1):135. doi: 10.3390/medicina58010135. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. PMID: 35056443 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intraductal biliary and pancreatic endoscopy: an expanding scope of possibility.World J Gastroenterol. 2008 May 28;14(20):3129-36. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.3129. World J Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18506916 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Optimal tissue sampling during ERCP and emerging molecular techniques for the differentiation of benign and malignant biliary strictures.Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr 15;14:17562848211002023. doi: 10.1177/17562848211002023. eCollection 2021. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 33948111 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical