Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of fecal Lactobacillus species in infants receiving a prebiotic infant formula
- PMID: 16597930
- PMCID: PMC1448991
- DOI: 10.1128/AEM.72.4.2359-2365.2006
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of fecal Lactobacillus species in infants receiving a prebiotic infant formula
Abstract
The developing intestinal microbiota of breast-fed infants is considered to play an important role in the priming of the infants' mucosal and systemic immunity. Generally, Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus predominate the microbiota of breast-fed infants. In intervention trials it has been shown that lactobacilli can exert beneficial effects on, for example, diarrhea and atopy. However, the Lactobacillus species distribution in breast-fed or formula-fed infants has not yet been determined in great detail. For accurate enumeration of different lactobacilli, duplex 5' nuclease assays, targeted on rRNA intergenic spacer regions, were developed for Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus reuteri, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus. The designed and validated assays were used to determine the amounts of different Lactobacillus species in fecal samples of infants receiving a standard formula (SF) or a standard formula supplemented with galacto- and fructo-oligosaccharides in a 9:1 ratio (OSF). A breast-fed group (BF) was studied in parallel as a reference. During the 6-week intervention period a significant increase was shown in total percentage of fecal lactobacilli in the BF group (0.8% +/- 0.3% versus 4.1% +/- 1.5%) and the OSF group (0.8% +/- 0.3% versus 4.4% +/- 1.4%). The Lactobacillus species distribution in the OSF group was comparable to breast-fed infants, with relatively high levels of L. acidophilus, L. paracasei, and L. casei. The SF-fed infants, on the other hand, contained more L. delbrueckii and less L. paracasei compared to breast-fed infants and OSF-fed infants. An infant milk formula containing a specific mixture of prebiotics is able to induce a microbiota that closely resembles the microbiota of BF infants.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Quantitative real-time PCR assays to identify and quantify fecal Bifidobacterium species in infants receiving a prebiotic infant formula.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 May;71(5):2318-24. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2318-2324.2005. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005. PMID: 15870317 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Similar bifidogenic effects of prebiotic-supplemented partially hydrolyzed infant formula and breastfeeding on infant gut microbiota.FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2005 Jan 1;43(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.femsim.2004.07.005. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2005. PMID: 15607637
-
Effects of probiotic or prebiotic supplemented milk formulas on fecal microbiota composition of infants.Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2006;15(3):368-76. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2006. PMID: 16837430 Clinical Trial.
-
Oligosaccharides in infant formula: more evidence to validate the role of prebiotics.Br J Nutr. 2015 May 14;113(9):1339-44. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515000823. Br J Nutr. 2015. PMID: 25989994 Review.
-
[Probiotics in infant formulae. Could we modify the immune response?].An Pediatr (Barc). 2008 Mar;68(3):286-94. doi: 10.1157/13116712. An Pediatr (Barc). 2008. PMID: 18358143 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Environment-related adaptive changes of gut commensal microbiota do not alter colonic toll-like receptors but modulate the local expression of sensory-related systems in rats.Microb Ecol. 2013 Jul;66(1):232-43. doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0241-0. Epub 2013 May 12. Microb Ecol. 2013. PMID: 23666270
-
Resistant starch from high amylose maize (HAM-RS2) reduces body fat and increases gut bacteria in ovariectomized (OVX) rats.Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 May;21(5):981-4. doi: 10.1002/oby.20109. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013. PMID: 23784900 Free PMC article.
-
Alterations in fecal Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in type 2 diabetic patients in Southern China population.Front Physiol. 2013 Jan 31;3:496. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00496. eCollection 2012. Front Physiol. 2013. PMID: 23386831 Free PMC article.
-
High Relative Abundance of Lactobacillus reuteri and Fructose Intake are Associated with Adiposity and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Children from Mexico City.Nutrients. 2019 May 28;11(6):1207. doi: 10.3390/nu11061207. Nutrients. 2019. PMID: 31141963 Free PMC article.
-
Efficiency of chemical versus mechanical disruption methods of DNA extraction for the identification of oral Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.J Int Med Res. 2020 May;48(5):300060520925594. doi: 10.1177/0300060520925594. J Int Med Res. 2020. PMID: 32459112 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adams, M. R., and C. J. Hall. 1988. Growth inhibition of food-borne pathogens by lactic and acetic acids and their mixtures. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 23:287-292.
-
- Agostoni, C., I. Axelsson, C. Braegger, O. Goulet, B. Koletzko, K. F. Michaelsen, J. Rigo, R. Shamir, H. Szajewska, D. Turck, and L. T. Weaver. 2004. Probiotic bacteria in dietetic products for infants: a commentary by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 38:365-374. - PubMed
-
- Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410. - PubMed
-
- Bakker-Zierikzee, A., M. S. Alles, J. Knol, F. Kok, J. J. M. Tolboom, and J. G. Bindels. 2005. Effects of infant formula containing a mixture of galacto- and fructooligosaccharides or viable Bifidobacterium animalis on the intestinal microflora during the first 4 months of life. Br. J. Nutr. 94:783-790. - PubMed
-
- Berthier, F., and S. D. Ehrlich. 1998. Rapid species identification within two groups of closely related lactobacilli using PCR primers that target the 16S/23S rRNA spacer region. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 161:97-106. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous