Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Apr 6:5:8.
doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-5-8.

LDL cholesterol estimation in patients with the metabolic syndrome

Affiliations

LDL cholesterol estimation in patients with the metabolic syndrome

Irene Gazi et al. Lipids Health Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The Friedewald formula (LDL-F) for the estimation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations is the most often used formula in clinical trials and clinical practice. However, much concern has been raised as to whether this formula is applicable in all patient populations such as the presence of chylomicronaemia and/or hypertriglyceridaemia. The aim of the present study was to evaluate various LDL cholesterol calculation formulas as well as LDL cholesterol levels provided by the Lipoprint LDL System (LDL-L) in patients with the metabolic syndrome (MetSyn).

Results: LDL-F showed significant differences from other formulas in the total cohort, as well as in MetSyn individuals. This was not the case in nonMetSyn subjects, where LDL-F did not differ with other formulas, with the exception of one formula (LDL by Planella, LDL-P). The bias between LDL-F and other LDL estimation formulas were significantly higher in MetSyn subjects compared to nonMetSyn individuals, except for LDL-L which produced similar bias with LDL-F in both study groups.

Conclusion: LDL-F seems to exhibit some limitations as far as the calculation of LDL-C levels in patients with the MetSyn is concerned. LDL-L might be more accurate in MetSyn subjects, but so far its use is limited for the estimation of small, dense LDL (sdLDL) cholesterol levels and mean LDL particle size for research purposes only.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Castelli WP, Garrison RJ. Wilson PW. Abbott RD. Kalousdian S. Kammel B. Incidence of coronary heart disease and lipoprotein levels:the Framingham study. JAMA. 1986;256:2835–2838. doi: 10.1001/jama.256.20.2835. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bairaktari ET, Seferiadis KI, Elisaf M. Evaluation of methods for the measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Therapeut. 2005;10:45–54. doi: 10.1177/107424840501000106. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP). Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) JAMA. 2001;285:2486–2497. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18:499–502. - PubMed
    1. Sniderman AD, Blank D. Zakarian R. Bergeron J. Frohlich J. Triglycerides and small dense LDL: the twin Achilles heels of the Friedewald formula. Clin Biochem. 2003;36:499–504. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9120(03)00117-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types