Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Mar;24(1):S23-30.
doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000220403.61493.18.

Long-lasting angiotensin type 1 receptor binding and protection by candesartan: comparison with other biphenyl-tetrazole sartans

Affiliations
Review

Long-lasting angiotensin type 1 receptor binding and protection by candesartan: comparison with other biphenyl-tetrazole sartans

Georges Vauquelin et al. J Hypertens Suppl. 2006 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The ability of biphenyl-tetrazole angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists (BTsartans) to block angiotensin II (Ang II)-mediated responses has been extensively investigated in vascular tissues and, more recently, in cell lines expressing the human AT1-receptor. When pre-incubated, BTsartans acted surmountably (shifting the Ang II concentration-response curve to the right) or insurmountably (also decreasing the maximal response). It was shown that their insurmountable behaviour is due to the formation of tight, long-lasting complexes with the receptor. Partial insurmountable antagonism is due to the co-existence of tight and loose complexes. The proportion of insurmountable antagonism, the potency and the dissociation rate of the BTsartans decreases in the order: candesartan > EXP3174 (losartan's active metabolite) > valsartan > irbesartan >> losartan.

Objective: It is of interest to explore how tight AT1-receptor binding of BTsartans such as candesartan might contribute to their long-lasting clinical effect.

Methods: Computer-assisted simulations (COPASI program) were performed to follow the receptor-occupation and protection by different antagonists as a function of time. Free antagonist concentrations were allowed to decrease exponentially with time.

Results: The simulations suggest that slow dissociation does not tangibly prolong receptor occupancy if the free antagonist is eliminated at a slower pace (as is the case for BTsartans). Yet when surmountable and insurmountable antagonists occupy the same amount of receptors, insurmountable antagonists offer appreciably better protection against fluctuations in natural messenger concentration.

Conclusion: Slow receptor dissociation and slow antagonist elimination are likely to act in synergy to produce long-lasting receptor protection.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources