Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 May;171(2):278-82.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0459-x. Epub 2006 Apr 8.

Temporal uncertainty does not affect response latencies of movements produced during startle reactions

Affiliations

Temporal uncertainty does not affect response latencies of movements produced during startle reactions

Erin K Cressman et al. Exp Brain Res. 2006 May.

Abstract

Previous research has shown that a startle 'go' stimulus, presented at a constant latency with respect to a warning stimulus, is capable of eliciting an intended voluntary movement in a simple reaction time (RT) task at very short latencies without involvement of the cerebral cortex (Carlsen et al. in Exp Brain Res 152:510-518, 2003; J Motor Behav 36:253-264, 2004a; Exp Brain Res 159:301-309 2004b; Valls-Solé et al. in J Physiol 516:931-938, 1999). The purpose of the present experiment was to determine the effect of temporal uncertainty on response latency during an RT task that comprised a startle stimulus. Participants were required to perform an active 20 degrees wrist extension movement in response to an auditory tone that was presented 2,500 to 5,500 ms after a warning stimulus, in 1,000 ms increments. On certain trials the control auditory stimulus (80 dB) was unexpectedly replaced by the startle stimulus (124 dB). When participants were startled the intended voluntary movement was initiated at approximately 70 ms, regardless of foreperiod duration. The magnitude and invariance of response latencies to the startle stimulus suggest that the intended movement had indeed been prepared prior to the arrival of the imperative go stimulus, within 2.5 s of the warning stimulus. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the prepared movement decayed over a period of at least 3 s.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neuroscience. 1999;91(4):1565-74 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1999 May 1;516 ( Pt 3):931-8 - PubMed
    1. Percept Psychophys. 1997 Oct;59(7):1089-97 - PubMed
    1. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1995 Nov;21(3):301-14 - PubMed
    1. Brain. 1991 Aug;114 ( Pt 4):1891-902 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources