Temporal uncertainty does not affect response latencies of movements produced during startle reactions
- PMID: 16604311
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0459-x
Temporal uncertainty does not affect response latencies of movements produced during startle reactions
Abstract
Previous research has shown that a startle 'go' stimulus, presented at a constant latency with respect to a warning stimulus, is capable of eliciting an intended voluntary movement in a simple reaction time (RT) task at very short latencies without involvement of the cerebral cortex (Carlsen et al. in Exp Brain Res 152:510-518, 2003; J Motor Behav 36:253-264, 2004a; Exp Brain Res 159:301-309 2004b; Valls-Solé et al. in J Physiol 516:931-938, 1999). The purpose of the present experiment was to determine the effect of temporal uncertainty on response latency during an RT task that comprised a startle stimulus. Participants were required to perform an active 20 degrees wrist extension movement in response to an auditory tone that was presented 2,500 to 5,500 ms after a warning stimulus, in 1,000 ms increments. On certain trials the control auditory stimulus (80 dB) was unexpectedly replaced by the startle stimulus (124 dB). When participants were startled the intended voluntary movement was initiated at approximately 70 ms, regardless of foreperiod duration. The magnitude and invariance of response latencies to the startle stimulus suggest that the intended movement had indeed been prepared prior to the arrival of the imperative go stimulus, within 2.5 s of the warning stimulus. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the prepared movement decayed over a period of at least 3 s.
Similar articles
-
Startle response is dishabituated during a reaction time task.Exp Brain Res. 2003 Oct;152(4):510-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1575-5. Epub 2003 Aug 1. Exp Brain Res. 2003. PMID: 12904937
-
Startle response of human neck muscles sculpted by readiness to perform ballistic head movements.J Physiol. 2001 Aug 15;535(Pt 1):289-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00289.x. J Physiol. 2001. PMID: 11507178 Free PMC article.
-
Startle produces early response latencies that are distinct from stimulus intensity effects.Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jan;176(2):199-205. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0610-8. Exp Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 16874516
-
Considerations for the use of a startling acoustic stimulus in studies of motor preparation in humans.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):366-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 May 11. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011. PMID: 20466020 Review.
-
Startle and the StartReact Effect: Physiological Mechanisms.J Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Nov;36(6):452-459. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000582. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2019. PMID: 31688329 Review.
Cited by
-
Neural processes mediating the preparation and release of focal motor output are suppressed or absent during imagined movement.Exp Brain Res. 2015 May;233(5):1625-37. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4237-5. Epub 2015 Mar 6. Exp Brain Res. 2015. PMID: 25744055 Free PMC article.
-
Timing of Gun Fire Influences Sprinters' Multiple Joint Reaction Times of Whole Body in Block Start.Front Psychol. 2017 May 18;8:810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00810. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28572782 Free PMC article.
-
Startle evoked movement is delayed in older adults: implications for brainstem processing in the elderly.Physiol Rep. 2014 Jun 6;2(6):e12025. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12025. Print 2014 Jun 1. Physiol Rep. 2014. PMID: 24907294 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence for startle as a measurable behavioral indicator of motor learning.PLoS One. 2018 May 9;13(5):e0195689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195689. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29742130 Free PMC article.
-
Response preparation changes during practice of an asynchronous bimanual movement.Exp Brain Res. 2009 May;195(3):383-92. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1801-x. Epub 2009 Apr 22. Exp Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19387624
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous