Efficacy of sulfasalazine in patients with inflammatory back pain due to undifferentiated spondyloarthritis and early ankylosing spondylitis: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 16606646
- PMCID: PMC1798286
- DOI: 10.1136/ard.2006.052878
Efficacy of sulfasalazine in patients with inflammatory back pain due to undifferentiated spondyloarthritis and early ankylosing spondylitis: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the effect of sulfasalazine (SSZ) on inflammatory back pain (IBP) due to active undifferentiated spondyloarthritis (uSpA) or ankylosing spondylitis in patients with symptom duration <5 years.
Methods: Patients with IBP and a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) >3 from 12 centres were randomly assigned to 24 weeks' treatment with SSZ 2 g/day or placebo. The primary outcome variable was the change in BASDAI over 6 months. Secondary outcomes included measures of spinal pain, physical function and inflammation.
Results: 230 patients (50% men, age range 18-64 years, 67% human leucocyte antigen B27 positive) were treated with either SSZ 2x1 g/day or placebo for 6 months. Enthesitis was found in 50%, and peripheral arthritis in 47% of the patients. The mean (SD) BASDAI dropped markedly in both groups: by 3.7 (2.7) and 3.8 (2.4), respectively, as did most secondary outcome measures. No noticeable difference in treatment was observed between groups. Patients with IBP and no peripheral arthritis had significantly (p = 0.03) more benefit with SSZ (BASDAI 5.1 (1.3) to 2.8 (2.3)) than with placebo (5.2 (1.6) to 3.8 (2.4)). Spinal pain (p = 0.03) and morning stiffness (p = 0.05) improved with SSZ in these patients, but other secondary outcomes were not markedly different.
Conclusion: SSZ was no better than placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of uSpA; however, SSZ was more effective than placebo in the subgroup of patients with IBP and no peripheral arthritis.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None.
Comment in
-
Sulfasalazine in undifferentiated spondyloarthropathies.Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007 Oct;9(5):349-50. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007. PMID: 17915087 No abstract available.
References
-
- Dougados M, van der Linden S, Juhlin R, Huitfeldt B, Amor B, Calin A.et al The European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group preliminary criteria of the classification of spondyloarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 1991341218–1227. - PubMed
-
- van der Linden S, Valkenburg H A, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 198427361–368. - PubMed
-
- Mau W, Zeidler H, Mau R, Majewski A, Freyschmidt J, Stangel W.et al Clinical features and prognosis of patients with possible ankylosing spondylitis. Results of a 10‐year followup. J Rheumatol 1988151109–1114. - PubMed
-
- Dougados M, van der Linden S, Leirisalo‐Repo M, Huitfeldt B, Juhlin R, Veys E.et al Sulfasalazine in the treatment of spondyloarthropathy. A randomized, multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Arthritis Rheum 199538618–627. - PubMed
-
- Clegg D O, Reda D J, Abdellatif M. Comparison of sulfasalazine and placebo for the treatment of axial and peripheral articular manifestations of the seronegative spondyloarthropathies: a Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study. Arthritis Rheum 1999422325–2329. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
