The costs of planned cesarean versus planned vaginal birth in the Term Breech Trial
- PMID: 16606959
- PMCID: PMC1421479
- DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050796
The costs of planned cesarean versus planned vaginal birth in the Term Breech Trial
Erratum in
- CMAJ. 2006 Jul 4;175(1):64
Abstract
Background: The Term Breech Trial compared the safety of planned cesarean and planned vaginal birth for breech presentations at term. The combined outcome of perinatal or neonatal death and serious neonatal morbidity was found to be significantly lower among babies delivered by planned cesarean section. In this study we conducted a cost analysis of the 2 approaches to breech presentations at delivery.
Methods: We used a third-party-payer (i.e., Ministry of Health) perspective. We included all costs for physician services and all hospital-related costs incurred by both the mother and the infant. We collected health care utilization and outcomes for all study participants during the trial. We used only the utilization data from countries with low national rates of perinatal death (< or = 20/1000). Seven hospitals across Canada (4 teaching and 3 community centres) were selected for unit cost calculations.
Results: The estimated mean cost of a planned cesarean was significantly lower than that of a planned vaginal birth (7165 dollars v. 8042 dollars per mother and infant; mean difference -877 dollars, 95% credible interval -1286 dollars to -473 dollars). The estimated mean cost of a planned cesarean was lower than that of a planned vaginal birth for both women having a first birth (7255 dollars v. 8440 dollars) and women having had at least one prior birth (7071 dollars v. 7559 dollars). Although the treatment effect was largest in the subgroup of women having their first child, there was no statistically significant interaction between treatment and parity since the 95% credible intervals for difference in treatment effects between parity equalling zero and parity of one or greater all include zero.
Interpretation: Planned cesarean section was found to be less costly than planned vaginal birth for the singleton fetus in a breech presentation at term in the Term Breech Trial.
Figures
Comment in
-
The economic case for planned cesarean section for breech presentation at term.CMAJ. 2006 Apr 11;174(8):1118-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060171. CMAJ. 2006. PMID: 16606960 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Not safer and not cheaper?CMAJ. 2006 Nov 7;175(10):1243-6; author reply 1246. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1060106. CMAJ. 2006. PMID: 17098955 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Jun;31(6):557-566. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34221-9. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009. PMID: 19646324 English, French.
-
Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial.JAMA. 2002 Apr 10;287(14):1822-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.14.1822. JAMA. 2002. PMID: 11939868 Clinical Trial.
-
Once more unto the breech: planned vaginal delivery compared with planned cesarean delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;125(5):1162-1167. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000824. Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25932844
-
[Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Benefits and Risks for the Neonate and Child of Planned Vaginal Delivery versus Elective Cesarean Section].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2020 Jan;48(1):95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Oct 31. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2020. PMID: 31678508 Review. French.
-
Breech presentation: Clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Sep;252:599-604. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.03.033. Epub 2020 Mar 25. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020. PMID: 32249011 Review.
Cited by
-
Breech delivery at a University Hospital in Tanzania.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1136-0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. PMID: 27821084 Free PMC article.
-
The Cost Implications of Less Tight Versus Tight Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy (CHIPS Trial).Hypertension. 2016 Oct;68(4):1049-55. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07466. Epub 2016 Aug 22. Hypertension. 2016. PMID: 27550914 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 21;2015(7):CD000166. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000166.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26196961 Free PMC article.
-
Preference and determinants of delivery mode in pregnant women with one cesarean scar: a cross-sectional study in two urban Ugandan public hospitals.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 6;25(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07263-2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 39915826 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for breech presentation using universal late-pregnancy ultrasonography: A prospective cohort study and cost effectiveness analysis.PLoS Med. 2019 Apr 16;16(4):e1002778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002778. eCollection 2019 Apr. PLoS Med. 2019. PMID: 30990808 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2000;356:1375-83. - PubMed
-
- Hewson SA, Weston J, Hannah ME. Crossing international boundaries: implications for the Term Breech Trial Data Coordinating Centre. Control Clin Trials 2002;23:67-73. - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization. Perinatal mortality: a listing of available information. WHO/FRH/MSM/96.7. Geneva: The Organization; 1996.
-
- Goeree R, Gafni A, Hannah M, et al. Hospital selection for unit cost estimates in multicentre economic evaluations, does the choice of hospitals make a difference? Pharmacoeconomics 1999;15:561-72. - PubMed
-
- Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Schedule of benefits, physician services under the Health Insurance Act. Toronto; 2003.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical