Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Apr 11;174(8):1109-13.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050796.

The costs of planned cesarean versus planned vaginal birth in the Term Breech Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The costs of planned cesarean versus planned vaginal birth in the Term Breech Trial

Roberto Palencia et al. CMAJ. .

Erratum in

  • CMAJ. 2006 Jul 4;175(1):64

Abstract

Background: The Term Breech Trial compared the safety of planned cesarean and planned vaginal birth for breech presentations at term. The combined outcome of perinatal or neonatal death and serious neonatal morbidity was found to be significantly lower among babies delivered by planned cesarean section. In this study we conducted a cost analysis of the 2 approaches to breech presentations at delivery.

Methods: We used a third-party-payer (i.e., Ministry of Health) perspective. We included all costs for physician services and all hospital-related costs incurred by both the mother and the infant. We collected health care utilization and outcomes for all study participants during the trial. We used only the utilization data from countries with low national rates of perinatal death (< or = 20/1000). Seven hospitals across Canada (4 teaching and 3 community centres) were selected for unit cost calculations.

Results: The estimated mean cost of a planned cesarean was significantly lower than that of a planned vaginal birth (7165 dollars v. 8042 dollars per mother and infant; mean difference -877 dollars, 95% credible interval -1286 dollars to -473 dollars). The estimated mean cost of a planned cesarean was lower than that of a planned vaginal birth for both women having a first birth (7255 dollars v. 8440 dollars) and women having had at least one prior birth (7071 dollars v. 7559 dollars). Although the treatment effect was largest in the subgroup of women having their first child, there was no statistically significant interaction between treatment and parity since the 95% credible intervals for difference in treatment effects between parity equalling zero and parity of one or greater all include zero.

Interpretation: Planned cesarean section was found to be less costly than planned vaginal birth for the singleton fetus in a breech presentation at term in the Term Breech Trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Fig. 1: Flow of participants through the study. A low national rate of perinatal death is ≤ 20/1000.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2000;356:1375-83. - PubMed
    1. Hewson SA, Weston J, Hannah ME. Crossing international boundaries: implications for the Term Breech Trial Data Coordinating Centre. Control Clin Trials 2002;23:67-73. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Perinatal mortality: a listing of available information. WHO/FRH/MSM/96.7. Geneva: The Organization; 1996.
    1. Goeree R, Gafni A, Hannah M, et al. Hospital selection for unit cost estimates in multicentre economic evaluations, does the choice of hospitals make a difference? Pharmacoeconomics 1999;15:561-72. - PubMed
    1. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Schedule of benefits, physician services under the Health Insurance Act. Toronto; 2003.

Publication types