Safety advantage of endocut mode over endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis
- PMID: 16610062
- PMCID: PMC4087690
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i13.2086
Safety advantage of endocut mode over endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate whether an automatically controlled cut system (endocut mode) could reduce the complication rate of endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and serum hyperamylasemia after EST compared to the conventional blended cut mode.
Methods: From January 2001 to October 2003, 134 patients with choledocholithiasis were assigned to either endocut mode group or conventional blended cut mode group at the time of sphincterotomy. The two groups were retrospectively compared for the complications after EST and serum amylase level before and 24 h after the procedure.
Results: Of the 134 patients treated, 79 were assigned to conventional blended cut mode group and 55 to endocut mode group. There was no significant difference in age, sex, and serum amylase level before EST between the two groups. Complications were found in 5 patients of the endocut mode group (9%): hyperamylasemia (5 times higher than normal) in 4 and moderate pancreatitis in 1. Complications were found in 13 patients of the conventional blended cut mode group (16%): hyperamylasemia in 12 and moderate pancreatitis in 1. Serum amylase levels were elevated in both groups 24 h after EST (P<0.02). The average serum amylase level 24 h after EST in the conventional blended cut mode group was significantly higher than that in the endocut mode group (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Endocut mode offers a safety advantage over conventional blended cut mode for pancreatitis after EST by reducing hyperamylasemia.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A prospective randomized controlled study of endoscopic sphincterotomy with the Endocut mode or conventional blended cut mode.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;49(2):127-31. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000096. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 24583745 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Endocut Versus Conventional Blended Electrosurgical Current for Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy: A Meta-Analysis of Complications.Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Aug;64(8):2088-2094. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05513-w. Epub 2019 Feb 18. Dig Dis Sci. 2019. PMID: 30778871
-
Small sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs sphincterotomy alone for removal of common bile duct stones.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 21;20(47):17962-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17962. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 25548495 Free PMC article.
-
[Type of electric currents used for standard endoscopic sphincterotomy does not determine the type of complications].Korean J Gastroenterol. 2004 Mar;43(3):204-10. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2004. PMID: 15034291 Korean.
-
Adverse events after biliary sphincterotomy: Does the electric current mode make a difference? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct;44(5):739-752. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2019.12.009. Epub 2020 Feb 20. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32088149
Cited by
-
Is there a safer electrosurgical current for endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with liver cirrhosis?Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016 Aug;128(15-16):573-8. doi: 10.1007/s00508-014-0677-3. Epub 2015 Jan 10. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016. PMID: 25576330 English.
-
A prospective randomized controlled study of endoscopic sphincterotomy with the Endocut mode or conventional blended cut mode.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;49(2):127-31. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000096. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 24583745 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Safety of different electrocautery modes for endoscopic sphincterotomy: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Dec 22;14:26317745211062983. doi: 10.1177/26317745211062983. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2021. PMID: 34993472 Free PMC article.
-
Endocut Versus Conventional Blended Electrosurgical Current for Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy: A Meta-Analysis of Complications.Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Aug;64(8):2088-2094. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05513-w. Epub 2019 Feb 18. Dig Dis Sci. 2019. PMID: 30778871
References
-
- Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:383–393. - PubMed
-
- Lambert ME, Betts CD, Hill J, Faragher EB, Martin DF, Tweedle DE. Endoscopic sphincterotomy: the whole truth. Br J Surg. 1991;78:473–476. - PubMed
-
- Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:909–918. - PubMed
-
- Huibregtse K. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy and their prevention. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:961–963. - PubMed
-
- Testoni PA, Bagnolo F. Pain at 24 hours associated with amylase levels greater than 5 times the upper normal limit as the most reliable indicator of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:33–39. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials