Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Apr;4(2):95-100.
doi: 10.2174/157016106776359835.

Pharmacological management of no reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention

Affiliations
Review

Pharmacological management of no reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention

Italo Porto et al. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2006 Apr.

Abstract

Angiographic no reflow is a recognized phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It usually follows successful lesion dilation and, by definition, it represents a reduction in epicardial coronary blood flow in the absence of identifiable dissection, obstruction or distal vessel cut off (indicative of distal embolisation). No reflow appears to be more commonly associated with PCI for acute myocardial infarction and PCI for saphenous vein graft occlusions. While the exact mechanism of no reflow is unknown, theoretical causes include local humoral and microembolic effects leading to microcirculatory dysfunction. As the process is multifactorial, various therapeutic strategies are required in different situations. The present day pharmacological management involves the use of vasodilators including nitrates, verapamil, papaverine, adenosine, nicardipine and sodium nitroprusside, but interestingly a vasoconstrictor like epinephrine may also have a role. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet receptors antagonist have shown a powerful de-thrombotic effect, and the intracoronary administration appears to be particularly promising. We review the pathogenesis of a reduced epicardial flow during PCI and focus on those drugs that have been studied for the treatment of no reflow. Although no double blind, randomized trial has been conducted to assess any of these agents, or to determine the appropriate dosage, we try to identify some useful conclusions from the published evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

Substances