Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 May;77(5):646-9.
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.076406.

Time dependent validity in the diagnosis of brain death using transcranial Doppler sonography

J-R Kuo  1 , C-F Chen, C-C Chio, C-H Chang, C-C Wang, C-M Yang, K-C Lin
Affiliations

Time dependent validity in the diagnosis of brain death using transcranial Doppler sonography

J-R Kuo et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 May.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the validity of transcranial Doppler (TCD) in confirming brain death from various pathological conditions.

Methods: An observational case-control study over a 2.5 year period, in which transcranial Doppler (TCD) examinations were done on 101 comatose patients for confirmation of brain death. Between October 2002 to May 2005, 44 clinically diagnosed brain death cases (29 male, 15 female; mean (SD) age, 46.5 (19.5) years; Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, 3.0 (0.0)) and 57 controls (36 male, 21 female; age 48.1 (16.5) years; mean GCS, 4.9 (1.7)) were examined. Reverse diastolic flow, very small systolic spikes, or no signals were considered characteristic of cerebral circulatory arrest.

Results: The sensitivity and specificity of TCD examination of both the basilar artery and the middle cerebral arteries (MCAs) in confirming brain death were 77.2% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity of TCD-diagnosed brain death increased with elapsed time. There was a trend for the basilar artery to have greater sensitivity (86.4% v 77.2%), higher positive predictive value (90.5% v 85.1%), and fewer false negatives (14% v 23.7%) than the MCAs for diagnosing brain death (all NS). The consistency of the basilar artery and the MCAs for diagnosing brain death was significant (kappa=0.877, p<0.001 and kappa=0.793, p<0.001, respectively).

Conclusions: TCD can be a confirmatory tool for diagnosing brain death. The validity of TCD diagnosed brain death depends on the time lapse between brain death and the performance of TCD. TCD of both the basilar artery and the MCAs showed significant consistency in brain death diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: none declared

References

    1. President's Commission Study of ethical problems in medical and biomedical and behavior research. Guidelines for the determination of death. JAMA 198124614–18. - PubMed
    1. Braun M, Ducrocq X, Hout J C.et al Intravenous angiography in brain death: report of 140 patients. Neuroradiology 199739400–405. - PubMed
    1. Buchner H, Schuchardt V. Reliability of electroencephalogram in the diagnosis of brain death. Eur Neurol 199030138–141. - PubMed
    1. Larar G N, Nagel J S. Technetium‐99 m‐HMPAO cerebral perfusion scintigraphy consideration for timely brain death declaration. J Nucl Med 1992332209–2211. - PubMed
    1. Paolin A, Manuali A, Di Paola F.et al Reliability in diagnosis of brain death. Intensive Care Med 199521657–662. - PubMed