Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 May;60(5):412-6.
doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.043646.

Actual and preferred place of death of cancer patients. Results from the Italian survey of the dying of cancer (ISDOC)

Affiliations

Actual and preferred place of death of cancer patients. Results from the Italian survey of the dying of cancer (ISDOC)

Monica Beccaro et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 May.

Abstract

Objective: To describe actual and preferred place of death of Italian cancer patients and to analyse the preferences met regarding the place of death.

Design: Mortality follow back survey of 2000 cancer deaths, identified with a two stage probability sample representative of the whole country. Information on patients' experience was gathered from the non-professional caregiver with an interview. A section of the interview covered information on the actual and preferred place of death of the patients.

Setting: 30 Italian local health districts randomly selected after stratification in four geographical areas.

Participants: 1900 of 2000 (95.0%) caregivers of cancer deaths identified.

Main outcome measures: Prevalence of actual and preferred places of death.

Results: Valid interviews were obtained for 66.9% (n = 1271) of the caregivers. Place of death was home for 57.9% of Italian cancer patients, hospital for 34.6%, hospice for 0.7%, nursing home for 6.5%, and ambulance for 0.4%. Wide and significant differences within Italy were seen (home deaths ranged between 94.0% in the south and 28.2% in the north east). Home was the preferred place of death for 93.5% of patients that expressed a preference, with minimal differences within the country (between 89.5% and 99.0%). Overall 67.1% of the sample died in the place where they preferred to die.

Conclusions: Policymakers should encourage health services to focus on ways of meeting individual preferences on place of death. As home was the preferred place of death for most cancer patients, effective programmes to enable the patients to remain at home should be implemented.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: none.

References

    1. Hunt R W. Place of death of cancer patients: choice versus constraint. Progress in Palliative Care 19975238–242.
    1. Higginson I J, Astin P, Dolan S. Where do cancer patients die? Ten‐year trends in the place of death of cancer patients in England. Palliat Med 199812353–363. - PubMed
    1. Costantini M.et al Geographical variations of place of death among Italian communities suggest an inappropriate hospital use in the terminal phase of cancer disease. Public Health 200011415–20. - PubMed
    1. Seale C. Changing patterns of death and dying. Soc Sci Med 200051917–930. - PubMed
    1. Grande G E, Addington‐Hall J M, Todd C J. Place of death and access to home care services: are certain patient groups at a disadvantage? Soc Sci Med 199847565–579. - PubMed

Publication types