So what is a sham peer review?
Comment in
-
Readers' responses to the letter by Chalifoux and the editorial by Bond in regard to "sham peer review".MedGenMed. 2006 Feb 2;8(1):34; author reply 33. MedGenMed. 2006. PMID: 16915164 No abstract available.
-
Readers' response to "so what is a sham peer review?".MedGenMed. 2006 Mar 27;8(1):83; author reply 82. MedGenMed. 2006. PMID: 16915213 No abstract available.
-
Readers' response to "so what is a sham peer review?".MedGenMed. 2006;8(1):83; author reply 82. MedGenMed. 2006. PMID: 16955548 No abstract available.
-
Readers' response to "so what is a sham peer review?".MedGenMed. 2006;8(1):83; author reply 82. MedGenMed. 2006. PMID: 16955549 No abstract available.
-
Readers' responses to the letter by Chalifoux and the editorial by Bond in regard to "sham peer review".MedGenMed. 2006;8(1):34; author reply 33. MedGenMed. 2006. PMID: 16967526 No abstract available.
-
Readers' responses to the letter by Chalifoux and the editorial by Bond in regard to "sham peer review".MedGenMed. 2006;8(1):34; author reply 33. MedGenMed. 2006. PMID: 16967527 No abstract available.
-
Readers' responses to the letter by Chalifoux and the editorial by Bond in regard to "sham peer review".MedGenMed. 2006;8(1):34; author reply 33. MedGenMed. 2006. PMID: 16967528 No abstract available.
References
-
- Menon v. Stouder Mem. Hospital, No. 96-CA-27, 1997 WL 71778 (Ohio App. Feb. 21, 1997)
-
- Johnson v. Greater Southeast Community Hospital Corporation, No. Civ. A. 90-192 (D.C. June 24, 1996)
-
- 822 F. Supp. 1361 (N.D. Iowa 1992)
-
- 64 F.3d 869 (3d Cir. 1995)
-
- Mathews, 87 F.3d 624, citing Smith v. Riks, 31 F.3d 1478 (9th Cir. 1994); Bryan v. Holmes Med. Ctr., 33 F.3d 1318(11th Cir. 1994); and Austin v. McNamara, 979 F.2d 728 (9th Cir.1992)
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
