SEM and microleakage evaluation of 3 flowable composites as sealants without using bonding agents
- PMID: 16615375
SEM and microleakage evaluation of 3 flowable composites as sealants without using bonding agents
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine if flowable composites can be used as pit and fissure sealants without bonding agents.
Methods: Three flowable composites (Filtek Flow, Tetric Flow, Charmfil Flow) and a filled sealant (Ultraseal XT Plus) were used. The patterns of resin tag formation in the 4 sealant materials were compared using scanning electron microscopy. For the microleakage assessment, 54 extracted human premolar teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups. In each group, a conventional filled sealant and 1 of the 3 flowable composites were applied to occlusal fissures. The teeth were thermocycled and immersed in a 1% methylene blue solution for 48 hours. Each tooth was sectioned and examined to determine the extent of dye penetration.
Results: Three flowable composites and a filled sealant showed a similar resin tag formation pattern. The 3 flowable composites showed significantly more microleakage in each group than the filled sealant. The level of microleakage was similar in the 3 flowable composites.
Conclusions: Concerning the microleakage data, use of the filled sealant is more effective in sealing mechanically prepared occlusal fissures in comparison to the flowable composites.
Similar articles
-
Variables contributing to the quality of fissure sealants used by general dental practitioners.Oper Dent. 2003 Nov-Dec;28(6):756-64. Oper Dent. 2003. PMID: 14653291 Clinical Trial.
-
The influence of Healozone on microleakage and fissure penetration of different sealing materials.Coll Antropol. 2009 Mar;33(1):157-62. Coll Antropol. 2009. PMID: 19408619
-
In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy.Front Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;16(1):21-30. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i1.1105. Epub 2019 Jan 20. Front Dent. 2019. PMID: 31608333 Free PMC article.
-
Retention of flowable composite resins in comparison to pit and fissure sealants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Gen Dent. 2020 Jul-Aug;68(4):50-55. Gen Dent. 2020. PMID: 32597778
-
Sealants: where we have been; where we are going.Gen Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;50(5):438-40. Gen Dent. 2002. PMID: 12448896 Review.
Cited by
-
In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of different pit and fissure sealants.J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Aug;6(Suppl 2):S111-5. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.184038. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016. PMID: 27652241 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of microleakage of two materials used as fissure sealants with different methods: an in vitro study.Int J Prev Med. 2014 Feb;5(2):171-5. Int J Prev Med. 2014. PMID: 24627743 Free PMC article.
-
Microleakage of a Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite, a Self-Adhesive Fissure Sealant and a Conventional Fissure Sealant in Permanent Teeth with/without Saliva Contamination.Front Dent. 2019 Jul-Aug;16(4):239-247. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i4.2082. Epub 2019 Aug 30. Front Dent. 2019. PMID: 32342052 Free PMC article.
-
Microleakage and penetration capability of various pit and fissure sealants upon different sealant application techniques.J Clin Exp Dent. 2023 Oct 1;15(10):e810-e820. doi: 10.4317/jced.60577. eCollection 2023 Oct. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023. PMID: 37933397 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the effect of high-intensity light-curing device on micro-leakage of pits and fissure sealants.Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Dec 30;39(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s10103-023-03963-3. Lasers Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 38159193
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources