When the visual format of the color carrier word does and does not modulate the stroop effect
- PMID: 16615381
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03193366
When the visual format of the color carrier word does and does not modulate the stroop effect
Abstract
We investigated the impact of making the color carrier word visually unfamiliar via case and font mixInG in the context of three Stroop experiments. Experiment 1 yielded an increase in the size of the Stroop effect when the color carrier words were visually unfamiliar relative to lowercase words that were case and font consistent. Experiments 2A and 2B showed that the modulation of the Stroop effect by visual familiarity observed in Experiment 1 was eliminated when there was no correlation between the color and the color carrier word. These results are considered in the light of four different theoretical accounts of the Stroop effect (strength of association [Cohen, Dunbar, & McClelland, 19901, instance [Logan, 1988], schema [MacLeod, 2000], and obligatory processing followed by deactivation [Coltheart, Woollams, Kinoshita, & Perry, 1999]). None of these accounts appear capable of explaining all the results.
Similar articles
-
The visual-auditory color-word stroop asymmetry and its time course.Mem Cognit. 2005 Dec;33(8):1325-36. doi: 10.3758/bf03193365. Mem Cognit. 2005. PMID: 16615380
-
A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Oct;10(5):622-39. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.622. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984. PMID: 6238123
-
Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory?Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):119-24. doi: 10.3758/bf03196356. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005. PMID: 15945205
-
Explorations of Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland's (1990) connectionist model of Stroop performance.Psychol Rev. 1998 Jan;105(1):174-87. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.174. Psychol Rev. 1998. PMID: 9450376 Review.
-
The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology.Psychol Bull. 1996 Jul;120(1):3-24. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.3. Psychol Bull. 1996. PMID: 8711015 Review.