A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems - which is best?
- PMID: 16620328
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01155.x
A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems - which is best?
Abstract
* In patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis, there is a lack of a universally accepted system for the evaluation of outcome. * This makes critical comparison between results less meaningful. * To determine the most suitable sinonasal outcome scoring system for use in our own practice, we reviewed the available literature and known systems in existence. * We analysed 15 known disease-specific sinonasal outcome indices with emphasis on reliability, validity and responsiveness. * We concluded by choosing one quality of life outcome tool for our departmental use, the Sinonasal Outcome Test-22, due to its reliability, validity, responsiveness and ease of use. * It has been validated to distinguish between disease-affected patient groups and those without rhinosinusitis, demonstrate a worse score if the condition gets worse and show an appropriateness of items and scales in the questionnaire. This has been demonstrated in 3128 British patients.
Comment in
-
A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems - which is best?Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Aug;31(4):340. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01261.x. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 16911661 No abstract available.
-
Responsiveness requires context.Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Aug;31(4):340-1; author reply 341. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01259.x. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 16911662 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
