A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems - which is best?
- PMID: 16620328
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01155.x
A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems - which is best?
Abstract
* In patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis, there is a lack of a universally accepted system for the evaluation of outcome. * This makes critical comparison between results less meaningful. * To determine the most suitable sinonasal outcome scoring system for use in our own practice, we reviewed the available literature and known systems in existence. * We analysed 15 known disease-specific sinonasal outcome indices with emphasis on reliability, validity and responsiveness. * We concluded by choosing one quality of life outcome tool for our departmental use, the Sinonasal Outcome Test-22, due to its reliability, validity, responsiveness and ease of use. * It has been validated to distinguish between disease-affected patient groups and those without rhinosinusitis, demonstrate a worse score if the condition gets worse and show an appropriateness of items and scales in the questionnaire. This has been demonstrated in 3128 British patients.
Comment in
-
A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems - which is best?Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Aug;31(4):340. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01261.x. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 16911661 No abstract available.
-
Responsiveness requires context.Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Aug;31(4):340-1; author reply 341. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01259.x. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 16911662 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test.Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Oct;34(5):447-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009. PMID: 19793277
-
Validity of a new health-related quality of life instrument for patients with chronic sinusitis.Laryngoscope. 2005 May;115(5):846-54. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000157693.92975.02. Laryngoscope. 2005. PMID: 15867652
-
A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems - which is best?Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Aug;31(4):340. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01261.x. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 16911661 No abstract available.
-
Clinical outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery.Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Jun;6(3):167-71. doi: 10.1097/01.all.0000225154.45027.a4. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006. PMID: 16670508 Review.
-
Adult chronic rhinosinusitis: surgical outcomes and the role of endoscopic sinus surgery.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Feb;15(1):6-9. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e328011bc8c. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007. PMID: 17211176 Review.
Cited by
-
Impaired eating-related quality of life in chronic rhinosinusitis.Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Mar;9(3):240-247. doi: 10.1002/alr.22242. Epub 2018 Nov 28. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019. PMID: 30485716 Free PMC article.
-
The Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 or European Position Paper: Which Is More Indicative of Imaging Results?Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jan;164(1):212-218. doi: 10.1177/0194599820953834. Epub 2020 Sep 1. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021. PMID: 32867591 Free PMC article.
-
Can we use the questionnaire SNOT-22 as a predictor for the indication of surgical treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis?Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jul-Aug;83(4):451-456. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jun 24. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017. PMID: 27381877 Free PMC article.
-
Normative data for interpreting the SNOT-22.Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2023 Dec;43(6):390-399. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2279. Epub 2023 Oct 10. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2023. PMID: 37814974 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing nasal symptom control.Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2009 Mar;9(2):134-9. doi: 10.1007/s11882-009-0020-7. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2009. PMID: 19210903 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical