A placebo-controlled comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil, 8 mg, and losartan, 50 mg, as monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension, using 36-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
- PMID: 16620350
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2006.00903.x
A placebo-controlled comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil, 8 mg, and losartan, 50 mg, as monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension, using 36-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
Abstract
This double-blind, randomised, controlled study compared the efficacy of candesartan cilexetil 8 mg (n = 87) and losartan 50 mg (n = 89), once daily for 6 weeks, relative to placebo (n = 80) in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure (DBP): 95-115 mmHg). Ambulatory BP measurements were done every 15 min over 36 h. At the end of the 6-week treatment, the mean change in DBP between the baseline and the 0-24-h period after the last dose of study medication was greater in patients receiving candesartan cilexetil 8 mg (-7.3 mmHg +/- 6.9 mmHg) compared with losartan 50 mg (-5.1 mmHg +/- 4.9 mmHg) (p < 0.05) or placebo (0.3 mmHg +/- 6.5 mmHg) (p < 0.001). The mean change in systolic BP (SBP) during this time was greater in patients receiving candesartan cilexetil 8 mg (-10.8 mmHg +/- 11.3 mmHg), or losartan 50 mg (-8.8 mmHg +/- 8.9 mmHg) than placebo (1.2 mmHg +/- 9.9 mmHg) (p < 0.001). Candesartan cilexetil 8 mg was associated with a greater reduction in DBP and SBP, relative to placebo, when compared with losartan 50 mg, during both daytime and night-time, and between 12 and 24 h after dosing (p < 0.001). Both active treatments were well tolerated. In patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, candesartan cilexetil 8 mg therefore had greater, more consistent antihypertensive efficacy throughout the day and the night, and long-lasting efficacy after the last dose, compared with losartan 50 mg. This greater efficacy is maintained with an excellent tolerability associated with members of the angiotensin Il type 1-receptor blocker class.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine besilate compared with candesartan cilexetil monotherapy and amlodipine besilate monotherapy in Japanese patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension: a multicenter, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.Clin Ther. 2012 Apr;34(4):838-48. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 Mar 21. Clin Ther. 2012. PMID: 22440192 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative effects of candesartan cilexetil and losartan in patients with systemic hypertension. Candesartan Versus Losartan Efficacy Comparison (CANDLE) Study Group.Heart Dis. 1999 May-Jun;1(2):52-7. Heart Dis. 1999. PMID: 11720604 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of the efficacy and duration of action of candesartan cilexetil and losartan as assessed by clinic and ambulatory blood pressure after a missed dose, in truly hypertensive patients: a placebo-controlled, forced titration study. Candesartan/Losartan study investigators.Am J Hypertens. 1999 Dec;12(12 Pt 1-2):1181-7. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00142-9. Am J Hypertens. 1999. PMID: 10619580 Clinical Trial.
-
Candesartan cilexetil: in children and adolescents aged 1 to <17 years with hypertension.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010;10(5):335-42. doi: 10.2165/11206300-000000000-00000. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010. PMID: 20860416 Review.
-
Candesartan cilexetil: a new, long-acting, effective angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker.J Hum Hypertens. 1997 Sep;11 Suppl 2:S91-5. J Hum Hypertens. 1997. PMID: 9331018 Review.
Cited by
-
Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers as monotherapy as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis.Eur Heart J. 2014 Jul;35(26):1732-42. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht333. Epub 2013 Aug 21. Eur Heart J. 2014. PMID: 23966312 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is the newest angiotensin-receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil more efficacious in lowering blood pressure than the older ones? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021 May;23(5):901-914. doi: 10.1111/jch.14227. Epub 2021 Feb 20. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021. PMID: 33609077 Free PMC article.
-
Simultaneous Determination and Pharmacokinetic Study of Losartan, Losartan Carboxylic Acid, Ramipril, Ramiprilat, and Hydrochlorothiazide in Rat Plasma by a Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method.Sci Pharm. 2014 Nov 30;83(1):107-24. doi: 10.3797/scipharm.1410-15. Print 2015 Jan-Mar. Sci Pharm. 2014. PMID: 26839805 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for nocturnal blood pressure reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2362880. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2362880. Epub 2024 Jun 3. Ann Med. 2024. PMID: 38830046 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of candesartan cilexetil on diabetic and non-diabetic hypertensive patients: meta-analysis of five randomized double-blind clinical trials.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3(1):165-71. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007. PMID: 17583187 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical