Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Apr;60(4):450-6.
doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2006.00858.x.

Controlling invasive pneumococcal disease: is vaccination of at-risk groups sufficient?

Affiliations
Review

Controlling invasive pneumococcal disease: is vaccination of at-risk groups sufficient?

M A Fletcher et al. Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Apr.

Abstract

Risk factors for invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) include young and old age, comorbidities (such as splenic dysfunction, immunodeficiencies, chronic renal disease, chronic heart or lung disease or cerebral spinal fluid leak), crowded environments or poor socioeconomic conditions. Universal use of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate (7vPncCRM) vaccine for infants and young children has led to significant decreases in IPD in the vaccinated population (direct protection), and there has also been a decrease in the incidence of IPD among the nonvaccinated population (indirect immunity; herd protection). While 7vPncCRM vaccine is administered universally to children in USA, many countries of the European Union have chosen to target children with comorbidities. This review aims to highlight individual risk factors for IPD, describe studies that evaluated pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in at-risk groups and estimate the proportion of at-risk children who may have been vaccinated in the European Union since the 7vPncCRM vaccine was introduced, using UK as an example. Although immunisation targeting only children with comorbidities may achieve satisfactory results for a few, many otherwise healthy children at risk simply because of their age will be neglected, and herd protection might not be established.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration representing proportion of children with invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) who have a risk factor

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ispahani P, Slack RC, Donald FE, et al. Twenty year surveillance of invasive pneumococcal disease in Nottingham: serogroups responsible and implications for immunisation. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89:757–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Melegaro A, Gay NJ, Medley GF. Estimating the transmission parameters of pneumococcal carriage in households. Epidemiol Infect. 2004;132:433–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Active bacterial core surveillance (ABCs) report emerging infections program network Streptococcus pneumoniae. [October 15 2004]. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/abcs/reports.htm.
    1. Levine OS, Farley M, Harrison LH, et al. Risk factors for invasive pneumococcal disease in children: a population-based case-control study in North America. Pediatrics. 1999;103:E28. - PubMed
    1. Shinefield H, Black S, Ray P, et al. Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in low birth weight and preterm infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002;21:182–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms