Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 May;90(5):586-92.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.082701.

Star testing: a novel evaluation of intraocular lens optical quality

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Star testing: a novel evaluation of intraocular lens optical quality

L Mitchell et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 May.

Abstract

Background: Despite the importance of optical quality of an intraocular lens (IOL) on visual outcomes following cataract surgery, objective data on their optical quality are not readily available, and manufacturing standards are industry regulated. The star test is a classic test of optical quality based on examination of the Airy disc and expanded diffraction rings of a point source of light, used mainly for telescope and microscope objectives.

Methods: A physical model eye cell allowed star testing of IOLs under conditions similar to the optical environment in which they operate. 18 IOLs were tested and results compared to actual images produced by these lenses in the model eye cell. Quantitative measures of star testing performance were developed.

Results: The optical performance of the IOLs varied, some performing very poorly. Most lenses (13/17) performed better in reverse orientation, while aberrations induced by the haptics of foldable IOLs were also detected. There was excellent correlation between actual images formed and star testing parameters.

Conclusion: Star testing IOLs was a novel biomedical application of a centuries old, inexpensive method. A concerning variation of optical quality was found, suggesting IOL optical performance data should be more readily available. Independent, authority mandated IOL optical quality standards should be developed, and results readily available to ophthalmologists.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors do not have any financial interest in the methods, materials, or any other aspect of this study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Norrby N E S, Grossman L W, Geraghty E P.et al Determining the imaging quality of intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 199824703–714. - PubMed
    1. Faaland R W, Grossman L W. Optical performance of decentered monofocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 199218286–292. - PubMed
    1. International Standards Organisation Ophthalmic implants—intraocular lenses. Part 2: optical properties and test methods. EN/ISO 11979‐2 (1999)
    1. Bellucci R, Scialdone A, Buratto L.et al Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: a multicenter randomized study. J Cataract Refract Surg 200531712–717. - PubMed
    1. Gozum N, Unal E S, Altan‐Yaycioglu R.et al Visual performance of acrylic and PMMA intraocular lenses. Eye 200317238–242. - PubMed