Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 May;90(5):627-39.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.068668.

The management of retinal vein occlusion: is interventional ophthalmology the way forward?

Affiliations
Review

The management of retinal vein occlusion: is interventional ophthalmology the way forward?

H Shahid et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 May.

Abstract

Retinal vein occlusions (RVO) are the second commonest sight threatening vascular disorder. Despite its frequency treatments for RVO are unsatisfactory and include several that have not been tested by large, well designed, prospective, randomised controlled trials. There is also the lack of long term follow up in many of the available small uncontrolled studies, and the timings of interventions are haphazard. This review aims to evaluate the current knowledge relating to the pathogenesis, suggested treatments for the different types of RVO, and their complications. Isovolaemic haemodilution is of limited benefit and should be avoided in patients with concurrent cardiovascular, renal, or pulmonary morbidity. Evidence to date does not support any therapeutic benefit from radial optic neurotomy, optic nerve decompression, or arteriovenous crossing sheathotomy on its own. Vitrectomy combined with intravenous thrombolysis may offer promise for central RVO. Similarly, vitrectomy combined with arteriovenous sheathotomy intravenous tissue plasminogen activator may offer benefits for branch RVO. RVOs occur at significantly high frequency to allow future prospective randomised controlled studies to be conducted to evaluate the role of different therapeutic modalities singly or in combination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: none declared

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Branch Vein Occlusion Study Group Argon laser photocoagulation for macular edema in branch vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 198498271–282. - PubMed
    1. Hayreh S S, Zimmerman M B, Podhajsky P. Incidence of various types of retinal vein occlusion and their recurrence and demographic characteristics. Am J Ophthalmol 1994117429–441. - PubMed
    1. Central Vein Occlusion Study Group Natural history and clinical management of central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 1997115486–491. - PubMed
    1. Central Vein Occlusion Study Group Baseline and early natural history report. Arch Ophthalmol 19931111087–1095. - PubMed
    1. Mitchell P, Smith W, Chang A. Prevalence and associations of retinal vein occlusion in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 19961141243–1247. - PubMed

MeSH terms