Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Feb;25(2):138-49.
doi: 10.1007/s10096-005-0080-0.

Adverse effects of antifungal therapies in invasive fungal infections: review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Adverse effects of antifungal therapies in invasive fungal infections: review and meta-analysis

S B Girois et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

Amphotericin B is the main therapeutic agent for the treatment of invasive fungal infections; however, it is associated with significant toxicities that limit its use. Other systemic antifungal agents have been developed to improve tolerability while maintaining the efficacy profile of conventional amphotericin B. Fifty-four studies involving 9,228 patients were assessed for the frequency of adverse effects of the main systemic antifungal agents. While the results suggest that liposomal amphotericin B is the least nephrotoxic of the lipid formulations (14.6%), that conventional amphotericin B is the most nephrotoxic (33.2%), and that itraconazole is the most hepatotoxic (31.5%), the lack of standard definitions of antifungal-related adverse effects limits the validity of these results. Furthermore, heterogeneous patient pools and differing protocols make it difficult to draw direct comparisons between studies. With the advent of newer classes of systemic antifungal agents, future trials should conform to definitions that are universally applicable and clinically relevant to allow for such comparisons and to enable evidence-based decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Corrected and republished from

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997 May;16(5):337-45 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med. 1998 Dec;105(6):478-83 - PubMed
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Jun;26(6):1383-96 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997 Apr;16(4):287-95 - PubMed
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 1996 Nov;23(5):964-72 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources