Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Apr 19:6:7.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6815-6-7.

A retrospective study of cochlear implant outcomes in children with residual hearing

Affiliations

A retrospective study of cochlear implant outcomes in children with residual hearing

Elizabeth Fitzpatrick et al. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. .

Abstract

Background: There has been increasing demand for the cochlear implantation of children who demonstrate some auditory capacity with conventional hearing aids. The purpose of this study was to examine speech recognition outcomes in a group of children who were regarded as borderline candidates for cochlear implantation as their residual hearing and/or auditory functioning levels exceeded typical audiologic candidacy criteria.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was undertaken at one Canadian cochlear implant centre to identify children implanted at age 4 or older with a pure-tone-average of 90 dB or better and speech recognition of 30% or greater. Pre-implant and post-implant open-set word and sentence test scores were analyzed.

Results: Eleven children of 195 paediatric cochlear implant recipients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Speech recognition results for the 10 English-speaking children indicated significant gains in both open-set word and sentence understanding within the first 6 to 12 months of implant use. Seven of 9 children achieved 80% open-set sentence recognition within 12 months post-surgery.

Conclusion: Children with several years of experience using conventional amplification demonstrated rapid progress in auditory skills following cochlear implantation. These findings suggest that cochlear implantation may be an appropriate intervention for selected children with severe hearing losses and/or auditory capacity outside current candidacy criteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Open-set word scores.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Open-set word scores (36 months post-implant).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Open-set sentence scores.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Median open-set word and sentence scores.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Geers A, Brenner C, Nicholas J, Uchanski R, Tye-Murray N, Tobey E. Rehabilitation factors contributing to implant benefit in children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, & Laryngology – Supplement. 2002;189:127–130. - PubMed
    1. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Green J, Roland JT., Jr Long-term effects of cochlear implants in children. Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery. 2002;126:505–511. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2002.124472. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miyamoto RT, Houston DM, Kirk KI, Perdew AE, Svirsky MA. Language development in deaf infants following cochlear implantation. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 2003;123:241–244. doi: 10.1080/00016480310001079. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O'Donoghue GM, Nikolopoulos TP, Archbold SM. Determinants of speech perception in children after cochlear implantation. Lancet. 2000;356:466–468. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02555-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH. Paediatric cochlear implantation and health-technology assessment. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 1999;47:141–151. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5876(98)00133-5. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources