A retrospective study of cochlear implant outcomes in children with residual hearing
- PMID: 16623948
- PMCID: PMC1479834
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6815-6-7
A retrospective study of cochlear implant outcomes in children with residual hearing
Abstract
Background: There has been increasing demand for the cochlear implantation of children who demonstrate some auditory capacity with conventional hearing aids. The purpose of this study was to examine speech recognition outcomes in a group of children who were regarded as borderline candidates for cochlear implantation as their residual hearing and/or auditory functioning levels exceeded typical audiologic candidacy criteria.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was undertaken at one Canadian cochlear implant centre to identify children implanted at age 4 or older with a pure-tone-average of 90 dB or better and speech recognition of 30% or greater. Pre-implant and post-implant open-set word and sentence test scores were analyzed.
Results: Eleven children of 195 paediatric cochlear implant recipients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Speech recognition results for the 10 English-speaking children indicated significant gains in both open-set word and sentence understanding within the first 6 to 12 months of implant use. Seven of 9 children achieved 80% open-set sentence recognition within 12 months post-surgery.
Conclusion: Children with several years of experience using conventional amplification demonstrated rapid progress in auditory skills following cochlear implantation. These findings suggest that cochlear implantation may be an appropriate intervention for selected children with severe hearing losses and/or auditory capacity outside current candidacy criteria.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Identification of Pure-Tone Audiologic Thresholds for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidacy: A Systematic Review.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jul 1;144(7):630-638. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0652. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018. PMID: 29800000
-
Cochlear implantation of children with minimal open-set speech recognition skills.Ear Hear. 1997 Jun;18(3):240-51. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199706000-00007. Ear Hear. 1997. PMID: 9201459
-
Evidence for the expansion of pediatric cochlear implant candidacy.Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jan;36(1):43-50. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000607. Otol Neurotol. 2015. PMID: 25275867
-
Delaying Cochlear Implantation Impacts Postoperative Speech Perception of Nontraditional Pediatric Candidates.Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(3):182-187. doi: 10.1159/000510693. Epub 2020 Dec 22. Audiol Neurootol. 2021. PMID: 33352551
-
Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy.Laryngoscope. 2005 Jan;115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200501001-00001. Laryngoscope. 2005. PMID: 15626926 Review.
Cited by
-
Trends in Performance Using Early Speech Perception Test in Typically Developing Tamil-Speaking Children.J Audiol Otol. 2022 Oct;26(4):192-197. doi: 10.7874/jao.2021.00703. Epub 2022 Jul 11. J Audiol Otol. 2022. PMID: 35799344 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparison of Surgical Auditory Nerve Response and Speech Outcomes in Patients with Post-meningitic Deafness and Without Cochlear Osteogenesis Who Underwent Cochlear Implantation.Cureus. 2019 Sep 13;11(9):e5650. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5650. Cureus. 2019. PMID: 31700752 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear implants and bacterial meningitis: A speech recognition study in paired samples.Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jan;17(1):57-61. doi: 10.7162/S1809-97772013000100010. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013. PMID: 25991995 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Moderating Effect of the End User in Consumer Behavior: The Acceptance of Technological Implants to Increase Innate Human Capacities.Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 22;7:132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00132. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 26941662 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Geers A, Brenner C, Nicholas J, Uchanski R, Tye-Murray N, Tobey E. Rehabilitation factors contributing to implant benefit in children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, & Laryngology – Supplement. 2002;189:127–130. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous