Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Apr 20:6:17.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-6-17.

Comparison of age-specific cataract prevalence in two population-based surveys 6 years apart

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of age-specific cataract prevalence in two population-based surveys 6 years apart

Ava Grace Tan et al. BMC Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Background: In this study, we aimed to compare age-specific cortical, nuclear and posterior subcapsular (PSC) cataract prevalence in two surveys 6 years apart.

Methods: The Blue Mountains Eye Study examined 3654 participants (82.4% of those eligible) in cross-section I (1992-4) and 3509 participants (75.1% of survivors and 85.2% of newly eligible) in cross-section II (1997-2000, 66.5% overlap with cross-section I). Cataract was assessed from lens photographs following the Wisconsin Cataract Grading System. Cortical cataract was defined if cortical opacity comprised > or = 5% of lens area. Nuclear cataract was defined if nuclear opacity > or = Wisconsin standard 4. PSC was defined if any present. Any cataract was defined to include persons who had previous cataract surgery. Weighted kappa for inter-grader reliability was 0.82, 0.55 and 0.82 for cortical, nuclear and PSC cataract, respectively. We assessed age-specific prevalence using an interval of 5 years, so that participants within each age group were independent between the two surveys.

Results: Age and gender distributions were similar between the two populations. The age-specific prevalence of cortical (23.8% in 1st, 23.7% in 2nd) and PSC cataract (6.3%, 6.0%) was similar. The prevalence of nuclear cataract increased slightly from 18.7% to 23.9%. After age standardization, the similar prevalence of cortical (23.8%, 23.5%) and PSC cataract (6.3%, 5.9%), and the increased prevalence of nuclear cataract (18.7%, 24.2%) remained.

Conclusion: In two surveys of two population-based samples with similar age and gender distributions, we found a relatively stable cortical and PSC cataract prevalence over a 6-year period. The increased prevalence of nuclear cataract deserves further study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cataract prevalence in cross-sections I and II of the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Congdon N, O'Colmain B, Klaver CC, Klein R, Munoz B, Friedman DS, Kempen J, Taylor HR, Mitchell P. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:477–485. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.477. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahmani B, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Gottsch J, Quigley H, Javitt J, Sommer A. The cause-specific prevalence of visual impairment in an urban population. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1721–1726. - PubMed
    1. Keeffe JE, Konyama K, Taylor HR. Vision impairment in the Pacific region. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:605–610. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.6.605. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reidy A, Minassian DC, Vafidis G, Joseph J, Farrow S, Wu J, Desai P, Connolly A. Prevalence of serious eye disease and visual impairment in a north London population: population based, cross sectional study. BMJ. 1998;316:1643–1646. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, Mariotti SP. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:844–851. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types